Kena stuck big time liao... they need another crazy $1900 psf RCR devt to rescue them, just like they rescue Thomson GrandOriginally Posted by Leeds
Kena stuck big time liao... they need another crazy $1900 psf RCR devt to rescue them, just like they rescue Thomson GrandOriginally Posted by Leeds
Wow, that's horrible. Is homogenous tile a trade mark of Capland? lolx!Originally Posted by teddybear
I went over to Ripple Bay SF last weekend and kind of fainted. It is really horrible, they are using laminate in the rooms, I was like .... I think I can't rem a EC using laminated, but a PC uses laminate!!! To add to the irony, I saw the ad that Michelle and Tay Ping Hui saying 'luxurious' finishing, I was like .....
Simi is plastic timbre? They using laminate too at SH????Originally Posted by Ringo33
Nowsadays, it seems to be their hallmark? Marketed as "designer" condos designed by so called "famous" architect, but give homogeneous tiles in living and dinning rooms, & laminate flooring for bedrooms (obviously bathrooms and kitchens also tiles lah!).
What's more, the so called "designer" condos are not practical at all! You sleep with your bedroom windows opened at night and the next day the floor near your window all dredged if it rains during the night! Soon all the flooring gone case!
Originally Posted by bakasa2002
Developer giving laminated flooring for PC is a real turn off for me, less than $3/psf.
I think some DBSS at least uses real wood!Originally Posted by maisonjai
Just like their d'Leedon. Early birds beware. Don't think they "rescue" Thomson Grand. Prices of TG appears to be flat or downward trend - manage to move units but prices not lifted by Sky Habitat.
Originally Posted by regency321
They are really stuck with SH. Their 4 bedders and those with terraces are so highly priced, a minimum 30% downward revision is needed if they wish to see any movement in sales.Originally Posted by Wild Falcon
TG selling out leh, people see the comparable prices vs the difference in quality, all cheong TG.Originally Posted by Wild Falcon
That's why Thomson Grand 100% sold already.Originally Posted by regency321
I wonder if anyone is able to speculate what Capitaland is doing. I mean what's their strategy? They sell 25% of D'Leedon after one year and SH is not exactly taking off. What would be their next step? Shouldn't their Board be asking questions? I am truly mystified.
Just surprised that Residential CEO of Capland is till around. On the other hand look at FEO. Lucas Chow must have helped them quite a bit in the chinese market.Originally Posted by insigina
dont u know who owns capital land?Originally Posted by insigina
Every developer has their strategy when it comes to selling developments.
UOL prices units to sell them all out
FEO don't mind holding onto unsold units for rental
Capland is learning from FEO.... They are not in a hurry after they sell a proportion of the total, if it covers part is not all the project cost. The rest of the units are profits.... They can afford to take the profits later. they probably see the market as holding if not rising... So why bother to sell in a rush?
IS there something they know, being owned by you-know-who?
So tell me... Really... Who is causing the upward spiral in land prices and launches? The answer is plain to see. Remember my poll on who is the evilest? Seems like most are still blur and pointing fingers at sales agents.
I think loss margins are relative. So long as there are bigger losses in the stable of the parent company, capital land can still take cover.Originally Posted by price
FEO is private and they have alot more hits than misses. They account to no one. capital land is public and they have a less than stellar track record. Like UOL, they ARE accountable.Originally Posted by sh
Only problem with Capland is that they have too many unsold units in every o f their recent new launches.Originally Posted by sh
CaPl half revenue from china probably why bother with a few projs in sg?
Ride at your own risk !!!
Bedok Residences sold quite well leh. Interlace, D'Leedon, Sky Habitat are clear mis-steps. Despite government link, it cannot get most of its sum right.Originally Posted by DC33_2008
Or should we say, precisely because of govt link...Originally Posted by hyenergix
BR is lucky to launch b4 CM5 ... its psf is pretty much the same as 8R suites yet is almost sold out in weeks ... 8RS probably will be much slower due to ABSD
Think about it, if not because of CM4/CM5, SH/D Leedon/Interlace probably will sell much better ..
Ride at your own risk !!!
without cms, closed 2eyes all island wide projects would be 100% sold out. piece of cakeOriginally Posted by phantom_opera
If they didn't use some fancy architects whose designs look good on paper but the layouts inside are not functional, they would sell better. A lot of investors would prefer to have efficient layouts and no need for fancy architect or iconic project. D'Leedon is wasted. It's a good location and should by rights sell well.Originally Posted by carbuncle
We will see how the GLS in Farrer Drive fares. It looks suspiciously like MMs going to be built there. Could be good for all the surrounding property which are being stalled by the poor sales in D'Leedon.
Have not seen d leedon's layout but i thought sh's layout for the 4 bed is very good. Just that the finishing is a bit cheapo.Originally Posted by chiaberry
I love the vintage distressed furniture (dinning table, chairs, photo frame etc) in the open terrace showroom,. Anyone has any idea where to get those?
This LTV 60% and ABSD artificially suppress the demand ... what if property prices never come down for next 10y (could be flat to moderate growth like 3% per year)?? The CM6 could lower the LTV to 50%, CM7 could lower it to 40%, then many middle class will not be able to buy investment property ... after 10y, PC market will be held by mostly upper middle class already
2010 to 2020 is a lost decade (eaten alive by inflation) for Singapore middle class ???
Ride at your own risk !!!
70% already quite aggressive. 60% is like clubbing the demand to death. And frankly, it favours the wealthy with all the capital in the world to deploy.
The intention may be good, but if low LTV and high ABSD last for 10y... it is going to distort the investment dynamics in Singapore ... middle class may be forced to invest in more risky stuffOriginally Posted by kane
Ride at your own risk !!!
Yah, like accidentally punt the wrong stock and lose 20% in a month... No thanks.