Page 82 of 148 FirstFirst ... 525762677277787980818283848586879297102107112 ... LastLast
Results 2,431 to 2,460 of 4428

Thread: A few CCR transactions sold at a loss (reported in The Edge)

  1. #2431
    teddybear's Avatar
    teddybear is offline Global recession is coming....
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    10,800

    Default

    What you said proved that the market has crashed, isn't it? Who is denying that market has not crashed?


    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    in the current market, some observations:

    1) sentosa condos, we have seen 2 units which were sold around 2700psf and sold for 1400psf, almost 50% down. feels like this area has been de-rated out of investors' radar. so let's not discuss this further, unless there are any bro/sis who are keen to buy there.
    2) the peaked at 3600psf ardmore park as catsick had pointed out, 1 unit has transacted at 26xxpsf. 1000psf off is between 25 to 30% off. however, we need to consider that some units have better views (for now). so for this highest luxury end (but old), in the current market, good buys are at around 25% off peak.
    3) the widely discussed grange infinite. ARA fund bought at 2600psf and sold at 2100psf. 20% discount.
    4) as we move even further down in both psf and quantum, we have seen that developers have been able to move stock at 10 to 15% discounts. similarly so for resales. e.g. tribeca (there is some discussion in that thread), a 13% discount off the peak for a similar unit. So i'd say, for units around 2000psf, good buys mean buying at 15% off the peak for a similar sized but superior unit.

  2. #2432
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    if u noticed, my point 2) was referring to the 3k+ and above and discount 25%, good buy at 25% discount.

    point 3) relates to the 2600psf or more now discounted to 2100psf. 20%

    point 4) refers more to say around 2350 discounted to 2000psf or even those below, peaked at 2000psf, now 1700psf would be good buy. in the latest tribeca unit's case, 19xx peak vs 1680psf now.

    Quote Originally Posted by safetyfirst View Post
    Thanks for the observation.

    To understand your pt 4 correctly, which is the deciding point, ard 2k psf or 10 to 15% discount off the asking price. Reason for asking being that some highly priced projects are asking 3k psf and above and a 15% discount may mean that psf is still ard high 2k plus psf.

  3. #2433
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    1) basic said will crash but everyone slam him leh?
    2) i don't know who you are referring to who is denying that market has not crashed.
    3) sentosa can be classified as crashed, the rest of CCR, still considered correction? i'm not sure.

    Quote Originally Posted by teddybear View Post
    What you said proved that the market has crashed, isn't it? Who is denying that market has not crashed?

  4. #2434
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    $2m is deemed "affordable" for D9 and 10. correction is minimal. perhaps this is evidence to bro teddy that certain segments has not crashed.

    if going by my staggered discount observation, around 2000psf/$3m in quantum or thereabouts units, good buy is at 15%, then at $2.5m, discount could be around 10% and $2m units, only need 5 to 10% discount off peak and can find buyers liao. (provided it is a good unit)

    Quote Originally Posted by smellyfish View Post
    Have the @2 million plus in district 9, 10 start to move downwards meaningfully?

  5. #2435
    teddybear's Avatar
    teddybear is offline Global recession is coming....
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    10,800

    Default

    Basic has been singing crash for many years already lah, he is perpetual bear............ (not like me also bear... )

    If any specific market has crashed, then there is a crash right?
    If only specific market/locality crashed but others didn't means policy loop-sided and poorly conceived?

    I am referring to somebody who was reported in the news saying that there is no property market crash................

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    1) basic said will crash but everyone slam him leh?
    2) i don't know who you are referring to who is denying that market has not crashed.
    3) sentosa can be classified as crashed, the rest of CCR, still considered correction? i'm not sure.

  6. #2436
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    47

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    $2m is deemed "affordable" for D9 and 10. correction is minimal. perhaps this is evidence to bro teddy that certain segments has not crashed.

    if going by my staggered discount observation, around 2000psf/$3m in quantum or thereabouts units, good buy is at 15%, then at $2.5m, discount could be around 10% and $2m units, only need 5 to 10% discount off peak and can find buyers liao. (provided it is a good unit)
    I was looking at a 2 bedder (#21-03) at Suites @ Central since last year. Seller asked for $2.6m early last year, reduced to $2.5m this year and finally sold at $2.3m in July. Seller bought it for $2.35m in 2011 I think. So he made a loss plus SSD. Transacted price is a 12% drop from his original asking price. So, there are significant drops even for 2m+ units in D9.

  7. #2437
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    96

    Default

    I think the price falls are all the high quantum stuff as the biggest impact is from TDSR , the stuff that people buy to rent out is the worst effected as why pay 10% stamp duty to get 2% yield will take 5 years to just get the stamp back , if you need to sell an expensive property you need to chop the price

    I think 10 mio quantum -25%
    5 mio quantum -15%
    3 mio quantum -10%
    2 mio quantum -5%
    1 mio quantum flat

    for sentosa double the fall

    Most non HDB properties in SG are 1-2 mio quantum, so the index of property prices not impacted a lot

  8. #2438
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    i was referring to recently transacted price vs peak (transacted price) for the project. in 2012, the #11-03 set the peak psf at 2471psf. the recent transaction 2273psf. hence, the discount from peak is 8%. in line with the 5 to 10%, if you can find a superior unit, its a good buy.

    there are of course, many other factors to consider. its just an observation that the % discount decreases with psf and quantum level.

    we can't really use asking price becoz those were imaginary numbers before TDSR decidedly sent the market for CCR down.



    Quote Originally Posted by triproton View Post
    I was looking at a 2 bedder (#21-03) at Suites @ Central since last year. Seller asked for $2.6m early last year, reduced to $2.5m this year and finally sold at $2.3m in July. Seller bought it for $2.35m in 2011 I think. So he made a loss plus SSD. Transacted price is a 12% drop from his original asking price. So, there are significant drops even for 2m+ units in D9.

  9. #2439
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    based on the ardmore park transaction, we can look for good buys for:

    5 to 10m at 25% discount
    3 to 5m 15%
    2 to 3m 10%
    <2m 5%
    1m no discount don't buy?
    Quote Originally Posted by catsick View Post
    I think the price falls are all the high quantum stuff as the biggest impact is from TDSR , the stuff that people buy to rent out is the worst effected as why pay 10% stamp duty to get 2% yield will take 5 years to just get the stamp back , if you need to sell an expensive property you need to chop the price

    I think 10 mio quantum -25%
    5 mio quantum -15%
    3 mio quantum -10%
    2 mio quantum -5%
    1 mio quantum flat

    for sentosa double the fall

    Most non HDB properties in SG are 1-2 mio quantum, so the index of property prices not impacted a lot

  10. #2440
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    some examples of old condos in the 2m quantum:

    Euro asia court
    25 AUG 2014 3 RIVER VALLEY CLOSE #04-02 RESALE 1,453 STRATA 1,486 2,160,000 PRIVATE

    no higher psf unit transacted for this size. but even for smaller unit, peak psf for this project was 1577psf, discount off peak is 5.77%

    Claremont
    26 AUG 2014 161 KILLINEY ROAD #06-06 RESALE 1,453 STRATA 1,575 2,288,000 PRIVATE

    new record for a non penthouse unit in this project in quantum terms. 2nd highest psf (peak was 1600psf for a smaller unit). discount off peak is a mere 1.56%.

    there seems to be some buyers for low 2m quantum and discounts are harder to come by.

  11. #2441
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    1 bedder at the metz

    21 AUG 2014 83 DEVONSHIRE ROAD #15-03 RESALE 581 STRATA 2,581 1,500,000 PRIVATE

    peak psf was 2,753psf and 1.6m.

    quantum wise, the discount is "only" 100k. discount is 6.25%. so the lower the quantum, the lesser the discount. despite psf in the 2500 to 27xxpsf range.

  12. #2442
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    1 bedder at the metz

    21 AUG 2014 83 DEVONSHIRE ROAD #15-03 RESALE 581 STRATA 2,581 1,500,000 PRIVATE

    peak psf was 2,753psf and 1.6m.

    quantum wise, the discount is "only" 100k. discount is 6.25%. so the lower the quantum, the lesser the discount. despite psf in the 2500 to 27xxpsf range.
    I remember viewing the metz in 2005. The one bedder was going for $700+k...unfortunately, I didn't take the plunge as it was above my budget. (First home).
    Everytime I walk by the place with my spouse, I go 'Big Mistake!'.

  13. #2443
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    in 2005, not many people could afford to buy prime, hence the low price. many were still reeling from the 98 till SARS crisis. i would say almost all properties bought between 2003 to 2005 have at least doubled their value based on the current prices.


    Quote Originally Posted by sporadic View Post
    I remember viewing the metz in 2005. The one bedder was going for $700+k...unfortunately, I didn't take the plunge as it was above my budget. (First home).
    Everytime I walk by the place with my spouse, I go 'Big Mistake!'.

  14. #2444
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    526

    Default

    Was browsing squarefoot and saw one transaction that caught my attention.

    The pier 600 sq ft $1.16m ard $1760psf... Maybe decoupling?

  15. #2445
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    Sold 26 AUG 2014 80 MOHAMED SULTAN ROAD #06-02 657sq ft 1,767psf

    Bought 22 DEC 2006 1,256psf

    seems like normal profit taking?

  16. #2446
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    Sold 26 AUG 2014 80 MOHAMED SULTAN ROAD #06-02 657sq ft 1,767psf

    Bought 22 DEC 2006 1,256psf

    seems like normal profit taking?
    You could be right. At $1.1xm, good buy for buyer.

  17. #2447
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    526

    Default

    Just wonder, at this price, isn't it a better buy than those new launch like commonwealth twr or highline at tiong bahru. Any thoughts?

  18. #2448
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    http://condo.singaporeexpats.com/con...ER-@-ROBERTSON

    657 sq ft but its still just a one bedroom. road facing also. $1.16m for a one bedroom seems "normal"? not like its super cheap.

  19. #2449
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    526

    Default

    , someone I know bought for $1.4xm, maybe slight larger for investment. So in term of rental, I guess not much different in rental $4k plus .

  20. #2450
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    maybe that one is pool facing unit lor. stack 4 and 26 are pool facing (sort of) units.

  21. #2451
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    some buyers just feel that FREEHOLD + CCR is a more worthy buy than the 99 year projects you mentioned below. these new projects have units which are smaller in size and higher in psf, selling point is low quantum.

    the buyers of CCR Freehold try to look for acceptable size at acceptable psf and hopefully can afford the quantum.

    other reasons why pple buy highline vs this unit for e.g.:

    this unit is only 1 bedroom. from the highline thread: 2BR (667sqf)
    #10-14 = $1,208,000 (1,811 psf)

    its a 2 bedroom unit.

    pay a little more (e.g. your friend's 1.4xm), can get a 915 sq ft 3 bedder at #06-11 = $1,462.7K (1,598psf)

    Quote Originally Posted by Werther View Post
    Just wonder, at this price, isn't it a better buy than those new launch like commonwealth twr or highline at tiong bahru. Any thoughts?

  22. #2452
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    some buyers just feel that FREEHOLD + CCR is a more worthy buy than the 99 year projects you mentioned below. these new projects have units which are smaller in size and higher in psf, selling point is low quantum.

    the buyers of CCR Freehold try to look for acceptable size at acceptable psf and hopefully can afford the quantum.

    other reasons why pple buy highline vs this unit for e.g.:

    this unit is only 1 bedroom. from the highline thread: 2BR (667sqf)
    #10-14 = $1,208,000 (1,811 psf)

    its a 2 bedroom unit.

    pay a little more (e.g. your friend's 1.4xm), can get a 915 sq ft 3 bedder at #06-11 = $1,462.7K (1,598psf)
    That's true also...agree with your analogy.

  23. #2453
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    some buyers just feel that FREEHOLD + CCR is a more worthy buy than the 99 year projects you mentioned below. these new projects have units which are smaller in size and higher in psf, selling point is low quantum.

    the buyers of CCR Freehold try to look for acceptable size at acceptable psf and hopefully can afford the quantum.

    other reasons why pple buy highline vs this unit for e.g.:

    this unit is only 1 bedroom. from the highline thread: 2BR (667sqf)
    #10-14 = $1,208,000 (1,811 psf)

    its a 2 bedroom unit.

    pay a little more (e.g. your friend's 1.4xm), can get a 915 sq ft 3 bedder at #06-11 = $1,462.7K (1,598psf)
    well depends on wat space u value. I rather feel 667sqf 1 bed room more livable than a 667psf 2bed room though.
    “Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.”
    ― Martin Luther King, Jr.

    OUT WITH THE SHIT TRASH

    https://www.facebook.com/shutdowntrs

  24. #2454
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    460

    Cool

    double post
    When you have eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth

  25. #2455
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    460

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by Werther View Post
    You could be right. At $1.1xm, good buy for buyer.
    On hindsight, easy to say. But back in 2006, it was pretty high....
    When you have eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth

  26. #2456
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,035

    Default

    UOB’s non-performing housing loans soared to 34.2 percent in Q2 2014, or its highest level since Q4 2004, reported the media.

    The sharp spike surprised Maybank Kim Eng given the perception that UOB is one of Singapore’s more conservative home lenders, with only a slight year-to-date correction in Singapore’s house prices.

    “We understand its NPLs were isolated to a group of borrowers who had invested in Turquoise, a high-end condominium project in Sentosa,” said Maybank in a report.

    URA data showed that two units there changed hands in Q2 2014 at 45 percent discount to their launch prices.

    The report noted that the transactions “stoked fears that it is a matter of time before default cases become widespread, undermining Singapore banks’ profitability that has been propped up by low charge-off rates.”

    To ascertain sentiment on the Sentosa micromarket, Maybank examined recent transactions of non-landed properties there.

    It found that there are nine condominium projects in Sentosa. The first four, launched during the nascent recovery of Singapore’s property market in 2004 to 2005, had an average selling price of below $1,600 psf, while the remaining five, which were launched later, were priced above $2,600 psf.

    “In our view, the large losses at Turquoise can be partially explained by the project’s higher launch price,” said Maybank.

    Notably, Turquoise’s launch price of $2,605 psf is about 75 percent higher than the average price at The Oceanfront ($1,360 psf) and The Coast ($1,592).

    “These two were launched one year ahead of Turquoise. This could mean that higher-priced projects at Sentosa are at greater risk of a price correction,” said the report
    The three laws of Kelonguni:

    Where there is kelong, there is guni.
    No kelong no guni.
    More kelong = more guni.

  27. #2457
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    chip eng seng's luxury boutique developments seem to have not made much money for the funds which bought them. worse, the retail buyers who bought from them at the peak of the luxury boom in 2007 are all sitting on paper losses. with the ARA fund which has now sold all but one unit at Grange Inifinite, attention can now be moved to Cityvista.

    http://www.aboutsingaporeproperty.co...roperty-funds/

    "The buyer is said to be a property fund managed by Alpha Investment Partners. Alpha is a unit of Keppel Land.

    The transaction involves 28 apartments (three and four-bedders) and two penthouses. The price for the apartments is thought to be about $1,850 per square foot (psf). The psf price for the two penthouses is said to be much lower as they come with substantial roof terrace areas, making up about half of their saleable area."

    http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/listi...sta-residences seems like its the fund which is trying to sell at from 1900psf for the standard units. similar to grange infinite, the 3 bedders are 2121 sq ft and 4 bedders are 2626 sq ft

  28. #2458
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    cityvista

    in 2007, 3 bedders were sold from 2376psf to 2701psf while 4 bedders were sold from 2472psf to 2874psf.

    in 2010, the fund bought at the following prices:

    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #20-01 9,192sq ft 1,078psf $9,909,358
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #20-02 9,160 1,118 10,245,268
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #02-04 2,142 1,767 3,784,332
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #03-04 2,142 1,777 3,807,220
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #08-03 2,809 1,785 5,013,463
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #04-04 2,142 1,788 3,830,782
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #09-04 2,788 1,788 4,984,291
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #02-01 2,121 1,790 3,795,788
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #04-03 2,142 1,793 4,708,906
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #10-04 2,788 1,795 5,005,566
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #05-04 2,142 1,799 3,854,344
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #03-01 2,121 1,802 3,820,981
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #11-04 2,788 1,803 5,027,871
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #09-01 2,626 1,807 4,745,555
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #06-04 2,142 1,810 3,877,906
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #12-04 2,788 1,811 5,050,174
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #04-01 2,121 1,814 3,846,174
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #13-04 2,788 1,819 5,072,479
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #10-01 2,626 1,821 4,782,318
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #07-04 2,142 1,821 3,901,468
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #13-03 2,809 1,822 5,118,435
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #09-02 2,626 1,824 4,789,663
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #10-02 2,626 1,832 4,810,670
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #11-01 2,626 1,835 4,819,083
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #15-04 2,788 1,840 5,129,348
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #12-01 2,626 1,849 4,855,846
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #13-02 2,626 1,856 4,873,370
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #13-01 2,626 1,863 4,892,611
    25 OCT 2010 21 PECK HAY ROAD #17-01 2,626 1,980 5,200,000

    happy bargaining.

  29. #2459
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    The Tate Residences

    Sold 5 SEP 2014 21 CLAYMORE ROAD #33-01 2,239sq ft 2,725psf
    Bought 30 APR 2008 2,730psf

  30. #2460
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    Duchess Residences

    Sold 5 SEP 2014 106 DUCHESS AVENUE #03-12 1,485sq ft 1,818psf
    Bought 3 AUG 2007 2,199psf

Similar Threads

  1. Proportion of loss-making transactions in resale market up in November
    By New Reporter in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 28-12-20, 21:35
  2. A few RCR transactions sold at a loss
    By wannabe in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 12
    -: 22-07-16, 17:21
  3. St REGIS: Sold for $15.8 mio loss
    By gsmsimmax3 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 11
    -: 18-03-15, 16:26
  4. More private properties being sold at a loss
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 05-02-15, 16:05
  5. Any RCR transaction sold at loss yet?
    By Poloclub in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 5
    -: 23-03-12, 00:16

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •