Originally Posted by
amk
actually I personally agree with chestnut, it is ok to pick individual bond over bond fund. in fact imo it should be better, esp for your purpose. individual bond once vested (and no leverage), no volatility to talk about: this thing is not meant to be traded month in and out. Your purpose is just to use the coupon to cover the funding. bond fund on the other hand, gives you diversification but not better credit. the biggest advantage of bond fund is just to allow you to invest piecemeal size instead of 200k lumpsum, for which many retail investors are unable to afford. And for that you pay a fee for nothing. If you have the capacity, there is no reason to use bond fund. Note here we are talking about blue chip bond/bond fund, not some HY. If you are concerned about the credit of the issuer, one has to take a position: do I have to worry about OCBC for the next 5 yrs ?
the ONLY issue of individual bond is this: it does not last the horizon you want. so you have to constantly (every 2/3/5 y) to look for new bonds. well you are savvy for that I'm sure.
The gist of you particular universal life game plan is this:
instead of
This is absolutely true for older ppl with very young kids (married late ?), and/or with any health conditions, for which cost of a high term life coverage is almost prohibitive. Using UL is a good trick. If you were younger (<40), a 1mil coverage costs no more than 2k, making this game plan irrelevant.
Universal Life plan is just a whole life plan with a twist (the portion going to "insurance" is not fixed). One should not use that for "investment". The golden rule of "buy term invest the rest" is always true. Except for your case, where you are treating it as an expense, NOT investment. Whole Life/Universal Life started in the west as way to dodge inheritance tax/estate duty. In SG there is no such tax now, there is even less reason to buy them.