Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 44

Thread: DBS FHR vs OCBC FDMR (Comparison)

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    299

    Default DBS FHR vs OCBC FDMR (Comparison)

    With the popular DBS's FHR facing its first direct competitor last month, I've decided to do a comparison here for borrowers who are stuck in between which floating rate is a better one.


    OCBC package as below for private loan
    1-3 years: 1.03% + FDMR36 (Fixed Deposit Mortgage Rate based on 36 months FD rate currently at 0.65%)
    Thereafter: 1.50% + FDMR
    Free conversion if there's any adjustment to FDMR
    Lock-in Period: 2 years

    Let me point out why does this package pale in comparison to DBS's FHR pegged loans.

    This package from OCBC is similar to DBS package below;

    1-3 years: 1.05% + FHR18 (Fixed Home Rate based on 18 months FD rate currently at 0.5%)
    Thereafter 1.80% + FHR18
    To take up mortgage insurance with Aviva (Monthly Fees can be as low as $30+ depending on the coverage that you're taking up)
    Lock-in Period: 2 years
    No partial prepayment penalty



    In Singapore, majority of the market shares of FD goes to DBS as you can see that as a Government owned Bank, it automatically etched into people's mind that the Bank is most stable one of all in the island. Everywhere you go, you can always seem to find one of their Branch/ATMs nearby(for every one UOB/OCBC ATM, you find two or more DBS ATM usually).

    With their majority shares on FD in the market, raising their FD will means that they have to payout to their customer the same interest as well which doesn't help them to get more client from mortgage sales.

    Now we look onto the difference between the two effective rate.

    DBS: 1.55%
    OCBC: 1.68%



    You can see the difference of it on the attachment that I've attached for a $1,000,000.00 loan with 30 years tenure.

    Assuming interest don't go up, 3 years interest savings at DBS is already $3,794.03 more than OCBC.
    Now that we're talking about interest remaining low for FD, I'll explain why DBS FD is better than OCBC FD.

    DBS started this FHR product about 2 years back in 2013, nearly 3 years since it came into the market while OCBC just started 1 month ago. It started out with FD based on the average of 12 & 24 months which is at 0.25% and 0.55% respectively, deriving at 0.4% effective rate. Until recently that they decided to come up with FHR based on 18 months FD which I'd like to think that they're not earning much from this package as they want to keep FHR low, but at the same time, not wanting to increase the spread again.

    With SIBOR going up tremendously since the start of year 2015, DBS FHR remains stagnant at 0.4% despite 3Month SIBOR(most common type of SIBOR that Singapore borrowers take up out from the rest of 1M,6M & 12M) going up 150% from 0.4% to 1% currently.
    This shows that package pegged to FD rates likely stays more stable compared to SIBOR pegged. However, we're talking about FD from OCBC right here so we'll be back to it.

    DBS FD rates is based on 18 months while OCBC is set at 36 months.
    The difference is simple if you ever owned a FD account.
    18 months FD means you're not tied that long compared to 36 months. When you're tied down longer, naturally, your interest yield is higher.
    With Singapore Savings Bonds introduced few months back, it means competition indirectly to both bank. This means that OCBC has the higher possibility to shift up their interest to attract customer to save money with them as they;

    - do not have the majority share in the market.
    - 36 months FD needs to give out higher interest than 18 months FD, logically.

    Very clearly, you can see that OCBC has a higher possibility to increase their FD compared to DBS.

    1) Their FD is not on the same level playing field as DBS which means their FD is on a disadvantage and will always remain higher than DBS until they come up with FDMR18 months to match DBS's FHR18. (Apple to Apple comparison)

    2) Free conversion doesn't help anything at all because when FDMR goes up, naturally, Board Rate and SIBOR pegged package are already ahead of them as FD rates is the last among the three to make any adjustment. (Eg: during March this year, most OCBC borrower(more than 2 years old client on their current loan) should received a letter from OCBC indicating that board rate increased from 4.5% to 5.1%) Should you convert to a free conversion, you'll be locked for another 2-3 years again which is not ideal for a board rate loan as you can see what happened to many borrowers from OCBC and UOB early this year, being subject to the bank's mercy.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,035

    Default

    But if refinancing with another bank incurs refinancing charges above 3-4K, then all savings is gone for OCBC customer.
    The three laws of Kelonguni:

    Where there is kelong, there is guni.
    No kelong no guni.
    More kelong = more guni.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    299

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kelonguni View Post
    But if refinancing with another bank incurs refinancing charges above 3-4K, then all savings is gone for OCBC customer.
    yes you are right on it, I'm saying about taking up a new loan or currently not from OCBC existing then makes much sense.
    for existing, as long as loan above $1M will be good enough as subsidy can be obtained!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,035

    Default

    Thanks. Both are actually decent deals still featuring interest rates below 2% for the next few years. Shiok!
    The three laws of Kelonguni:

    Where there is kelong, there is guni.
    No kelong no guni.
    More kelong = more guni.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    299

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kelonguni View Post
    Thanks. Both are actually decent deals still featuring interest rates below 2% for the next few years. Shiok!
    If I'm buying a property, I'll go with DBS package definitely for the circumstances now. It makes more sense compared to OCBC 36 months FD.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,988

    Default

    There is no need to compare. A 18m rate is lower than 36m rate, by default.

    Separately, you need to educate ppl on the complete and total uselessness of "free conversion" feature of any loan package. Not because of the reasons you mentioned, but because of this one: the loan packages that are "available for your free conversion" are completely at bank's discretion, and have nothing to do with whatever prevailing rates or promotions at that time.

    Example: your current rate is 2%, you are not happy about the rate, you go ask for "free conversion"
    bank: "no problem, for you the free conversion rate will be xxx plus ###, that is 2.5% today".
    you: "but your current rate for new mortgage either refinance or new loan is xxx plus ## 1.8% only ? I want that one"
    bank: "yea but that package is not available to you. for conversion you only have this."

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,035

    Default

    But actually if no free conversion there will be charges for repricing no? Like $800...

    Quote Originally Posted by amk View Post
    There is no need to compare. A 18m rate is lower than 36m rate, by default.

    Separately, you need to educate ppl on the complete and total uselessness of "free conversion" feature of any loan package. Not because of the reasons you mentioned, but because of this one: the loan packages that are "available for your free conversion" are completely at bank's discretion, and have nothing to do with whatever prevailing rates or promotions at that time.

    Example: your current rate is 2%, you are not happy about the rate, you go ask for "free conversion"
    bank: "no problem, for you the free conversion rate will be xxx plus ###, that is 2.5% today".
    you: "but your current rate for new mortgage either refinance or new loan is xxx plus ## 1.8% only ? I want that one"
    bank: "yea but that package is not available to you. for conversion you only have this."
    The three laws of Kelonguni:

    Where there is kelong, there is guni.
    No kelong no guni.
    More kelong = more guni.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    299

    Default

    Educating people on the free conversion being useless I do agree.
    But some times, a bank will waive off it if the loan amount is more than a million. So it still depends largely on the current environment by then.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,035

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MortgageGuru View Post
    Educating people on the free conversion being useless I do agree.
    But some times, a bank will waive off it if the loan amount is more than a million. So it still depends largely on the current environment by then.
    True also, but sooner or later the loan has to go below 1million. The threshold is still pretty high. But it's great to know options so we can do some long term evaluation.
    The three laws of Kelonguni:

    Where there is kelong, there is guni.
    No kelong no guni.
    More kelong = more guni.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    299

    Default

    When your loan goes lower and your age go higher, it's time for retirement and that's the time you have to source for loans that allows you to have a peaceful time in the thereafter years when you do not have any income anymore and 1.25+fhr is the kind of loan that suits best for people in such situation.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    299

    Default

    FED announced interest rise, I will update this space once there's movement on loan package from banks.
    With what happened early this year, we should see bank spiking up the rates very soon.

  12. #12
    teddybear's Avatar
    teddybear is offline Global recession is coming....
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    10,800

    Default

    What about after 3rd year till end of 30 years period (assuming the difference between FDMR and FHR is fixed)?

    How about comparing to 3M SIBOR + 1.25% throughout?


    Quote Originally Posted by MortgageGuru View Post
    With the popular DBS's FHR facing its first direct competitor last month, I've decided to do a comparison here for borrowers who are stuck in between which floating rate is a better one.


    OCBC package as below for private loan
    1-3 years: 1.03% + FDMR36 (Fixed Deposit Mortgage Rate based on 36 months FD rate currently at 0.65%)
    Thereafter: 1.50% + FDMR
    Free conversion if there's any adjustment to FDMR
    Lock-in Period: 2 years

    Let me point out why does this package pale in comparison to DBS's FHR pegged loans.

    This package from OCBC is similar to DBS package below;

    1-3 years: 1.05% + FHR18 (Fixed Home Rate based on 18 months FD rate currently at 0.5%)
    Thereafter 1.80% + FHR18
    To take up mortgage insurance with Aviva (Monthly Fees can be as low as $30+ depending on the coverage that you're taking up)
    Lock-in Period: 2 years
    No partial prepayment penalty



    In Singapore, majority of the market shares of FD goes to DBS as you can see that as a Government owned Bank, it automatically etched into people's mind that the Bank is most stable one of all in the island. Everywhere you go, you can always seem to find one of their Branch/ATMs nearby(for every one UOB/OCBC ATM, you find two or more DBS ATM usually).

    With their majority shares on FD in the market, raising their FD will means that they have to payout to their customer the same interest as well which doesn't help them to get more client from mortgage sales.

    Now we look onto the difference between the two effective rate.

    DBS: 1.55%
    OCBC: 1.68%



    You can see the difference of it on the attachment that I've attached for a $1,000,000.00 loan with 30 years tenure.

    Assuming interest don't go up, 3 years interest savings at DBS is already $3,794.03 more than OCBC.
    Now that we're talking about interest remaining low for FD, I'll explain why DBS FD is better than OCBC FD.

    DBS started this FHR product about 2 years back in 2013, nearly 3 years since it came into the market while OCBC just started 1 month ago. It started out with FD based on the average of 12 & 24 months which is at 0.25% and 0.55% respectively, deriving at 0.4% effective rate. Until recently that they decided to come up with FHR based on 18 months FD which I'd like to think that they're not earning much from this package as they want to keep FHR low, but at the same time, not wanting to increase the spread again.

    With SIBOR going up tremendously since the start of year 2015, DBS FHR remains stagnant at 0.4% despite 3Month SIBOR(most common type of SIBOR that Singapore borrowers take up out from the rest of 1M,6M & 12M) going up 150% from 0.4% to 1% currently.
    This shows that package pegged to FD rates likely stays more stable compared to SIBOR pegged. However, we're talking about FD from OCBC right here so we'll be back to it.

    DBS FD rates is based on 18 months while OCBC is set at 36 months.
    The difference is simple if you ever owned a FD account.
    18 months FD means you're not tied that long compared to 36 months. When you're tied down longer, naturally, your interest yield is higher.
    With Singapore Savings Bonds introduced few months back, it means competition indirectly to both bank. This means that OCBC has the higher possibility to shift up their interest to attract customer to save money with them as they;

    - do not have the majority share in the market.
    - 36 months FD needs to give out higher interest than 18 months FD, logically.

    Very clearly, you can see that OCBC has a higher possibility to increase their FD compared to DBS.

    1) Their FD is not on the same level playing field as DBS which means their FD is on a disadvantage and will always remain higher than DBS until they come up with FDMR18 months to match DBS's FHR18. (Apple to Apple comparison)

    2) Free conversion doesn't help anything at all because when FDMR goes up, naturally, Board Rate and SIBOR pegged package are already ahead of them as FD rates is the last among the three to make any adjustment. (Eg: during March this year, most OCBC borrower(more than 2 years old client on their current loan) should received a letter from OCBC indicating that board rate increased from 4.5% to 5.1%) Should you convert to a free conversion, you'll be locked for another 2-3 years again which is not ideal for a board rate loan as you can see what happened to many borrowers from OCBC and UOB early this year, being subject to the bank's mercy.

  13. #13
    teddybear's Avatar
    teddybear is offline Global recession is coming....
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    10,800

    Default

    Haven't they already spiked SIBOR rate from about 0.4% to 1.15% despite the fact that there was no Fed rate change then?

    If they spike against after having pre-empt Fed rate increase, it becomes questionable, especially when SIBOR is supposed to be a competitive rate (and there is FHR still at 0.5% to compete with it)........

    Looks like SIBOR loan is going to be real lousy going forward (unless it really is a competitive rate and not increase like a cartel...)

    And I had already warned very long time ago that people should avoid SOR loan (the time when SOR is at like 0.3% and SIBOR at 0.5%), hope nobody here had taken up SOR loan.....

    Quote Originally Posted by MortgageGuru View Post
    FED announced interest rise, I will update this space once there's movement on loan package from banks.
    With what happened early this year, we should see bank spiking up the rates very soon.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    299

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by teddybear View Post
    What about after 3rd year till end of 30 years period (assuming the difference between FDMR and FHR is fixed)?

    How about comparing to 3M SIBOR + 1.25% throughout?
    That's why I recommend 1.25 + fhr instead of 1.05 + fhr as 1.25 is a throughout package.

    I don't think 3M sibor is worth a fight against fixed deposit rate at all. Past trend shows fixed deposit rate being low while sibor much higher, even though fix deposit pegged loan only introduced in recent years for dbs, it should already proved that it's much better than sibor when you see ocbc launched their fixed deposit pegged loan just two months ago. I think we can see uob coming up with their own FD pegged loans very soon as well.
    You can see sibor/sor creeping up in the past week or so.. definitely will rise higher in the coming week.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,739

    Default

    MortgageGuru,
    for those with some money,
    if we take DBS FHR, do we put FD in DBS?
    if we take OCBC FDMR, do we put FD in OCBC?
    would not these FD partially offset the FDMR36/FHR18 ?
    so would the OCBC deal be better, at least for those with some money?

    and for those with some money, would Stanchart Mortgage One be a better deal than both the OCBC and DBS?
    because lets say we put FD for 18 months at 0.5% at DBS, to offset the FHR18.
    next month, DBS increase the FHR18 to 0.55%. but our FD still earn 0.5% (for the next 17 months), there is a difference of 0.05%.
    or does both OCBC and DBS reprice at 36 and 18 months interval respectively?

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    299

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hopeful View Post
    MortgageGuru,
    for those with some money,
    if we take DBS FHR, do we put FD in DBS?
    if we take OCBC FDMR, do we put FD in OCBC?
    would not these FD partially offset the FDMR36/FHR18 ?
    so would the OCBC deal be better, at least for those with some money?

    and for those with some money, would Stanchart Mortgage One be a better deal than both the OCBC and DBS?
    because lets say we put FD for 18 months at 0.5% at DBS, to offset the FHR18.
    next month, DBS increase the FHR18 to 0.55%. but our FD still earn 0.5% (for the next 17 months), there is a difference of 0.05%.
    or does both OCBC and DBS reprice at 36 and 18 months interval respectively?
    No. You can compared mortgageone with fixed deposit offset.
    Mortgage one they go by the amount that you put in and offset a certain percentage up to a capped of the bank. The offset is much significant compared to fixed deposit offset as fixed deposit returns is much lower.
    As for the 18 or 36 month reprice issue, they don't reprice or the so called reset date like sibor/sor, sibor/sor have different months of variation for you to choose for as it's based on the reset date, the longer duration of sibor/sor you take up, the higher it is and the commitment will be the number of months for it.
    So for example you take a 3 month sibor, your rate reset every 3 month on a certain day of the month, likewise, if you take up 1 month sibor, your rate will reset every 1 month to that certain day of sibor rate. As for fixed deposit pegged loans, they don't tie you down to 36 month or 18 month, they use the chart as the indicative rate for the month to add on top of the spread.
    In short, sibor pegged loan can has a higher offset when you take up mortgageone but subject to sibor hike whereby you can offset some back with your FD in it.
    As for FD pegged loan, you can't really hedge against it with your FD in it because when your loan rate increase, your FD doesn't increase.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    299

    Default

    update: FHR18 increased by 0.1%

    No news on FHR12&24, take it as good news for no news.

    May refer to here for the FD rates at DBS.

    http://www.dbs.com.sg/personal/rates...-deposits.page

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    299

    Default

    update: FHR18 increased by 0.1%

    FHR12&24, increased by 0.1% as well.

    May refer to here for the FD rates at DBS.

    http://www.dbs.com.sg/personal/rates...-deposits.page

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,099

    Default

    U sure 0.1 for fhr?

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    299

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by newbie11 View Post
    U sure 0.1 for fhr?
    yes. spread remains the same, just fhr increasing.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    299

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MortgageGuru View Post
    update: FHR18 increased by 0.1%

    FHR12&24, increased by 0.1% as well.

    May refer to here for the FD rates at DBS.

    http://www.dbs.com.sg/personal/rates...-deposits.page
    Sorry, note the difference...

    *FHR 12&24 months increased by 0.275 to 0.675 instead of 0.1.

    FHR18 increased by 0.1 to 0.6.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    5,837

    Default

    Has SIBOR increased at all after the FED rate hike ?


    So have those who took up FIXED rate since H2 benefitted ?

    Or have those who took up Floating rate actually better off ?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    299

    Default

    It depends. Fixed rate holder may have a peace of mind right now.
    Sibor not yet making any stark movement so far.
    If there's no further jump on fhr for the first half of 2016, fhr will still be a good choice. Took almost a year for fhr to rise after sibor hike, I stand by fhr choice.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Im looking at repricing my mortgage with OCBC and lost between the different options:
    - Fixed rate for 2 years (2.18%)
    - 36 months FDMR based (1.78% based on 36 FDMR - 1.13%)
    - SIBOR pegged (around 2% based on current SIBOR)
    - Board Rate Based (1.68% based on current board rate)
    I've read the previous threads but quite lost.

    Would be tempted to forget about Board Rate based as totally at the discretion of OCBC to increase and looking for something determined more "objectively".
    SIBOR does not seem very interesting compared to Fixed Rate
    But difference between 36 months FDMR compared to fixed rate is quite large so i would be tempted to go with FDMR based.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    299

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sophiel View Post
    Im looking at repricing my mortgage with OCBC and lost between the different options:
    - Fixed rate for 2 years (2.18%)
    - 36 months FDMR based (1.78% based on 36 FDMR - 1.13%)
    - SIBOR pegged (around 2% based on current SIBOR)
    - Board Rate Based (1.68% based on current board rate)
    I've read the previous threads but quite lost.

    Would be tempted to forget about Board Rate based as totally at the discretion of OCBC to increase and looking for something determined more "objectively".
    SIBOR does not seem very interesting compared to Fixed Rate
    But difference between 36 months FDMR compared to fixed rate is quite large so i would be tempted to go with FDMR based.
    Taking up FDMR is good also. You should!

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    789

    Default

    For the Dbs $800 repricing fee, can use cpf to settle?

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    299

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by henryhk View Post
    For the Dbs $800 repricing fee, can use cpf to settle?
    Only cash!

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    9,217

    Default

    Is it true that purchase of DBS 18FHR home loan has to purchase their Mortgage insurance?

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    299

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DC33_2008 View Post
    Is it true that purchase of DBS 18FHR home loan has to purchase their Mortgage insurance?
    Yes you're right.
    Have to take up mortgage insurance or else the spread will be 0.1% higher.
    However, if your loan is more than 3M, dbs allows 1.88% fixed for 3 years.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    9,217

    Default

    How about UOB home loan as compared to OCBC and dbs?
    Quote Originally Posted by MortgageGuru View Post
    Yes you're right.
    Have to take up mortgage insurance or else the spread will be 0.1% higher.
    However, if your loan is more than 3M, dbs allows 1.88% fixed for 3 years.

Similar Threads

  1. Geylang Shoebox Condos – A Comparison
    By Arcachon in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 1
    -: 29-12-18, 19:22
  2. Leasehold Versus Freehold - The Comparison Continues (2016)
    By kurama in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 21
    -: 27-08-18, 08:02
  3. Leasehold versus Freehold - the Comparison Continues (2016)
    By Kelonguni in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 304
    -: 15-12-17, 17:44
  4. Replies: 5
    -: 17-03-14, 03:23
  5. Comparison between SV and Thomson 3
    By princess_morbucks in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 9
    -: 02-10-13, 19:42

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •