PDA

View Full Version : Lay down the cooling measures to be taken upfront



mr funny
18-01-11, 02:12
http://www.todayonline.com/Business/Property/EDC110114-0000182/Lay-down-the-cooling-measures-to-be-taken-upfront

Lay down the cooling measures to be taken upfront

by Colin Tan

Updated 11:11 AM Jan 14, 2011


In a Sunday feature article entitled "History-making year ahead", eight events and issues were highlighted by the writer which are expected to loom large in 2011. Seventh on the list was how to cool the property market without crashing it.

Last year, private housing prices eclipsed the previous 1996 peak, while the cash-over-valuation (COV) levels for public flats reached historic highs even as the Government unveiled two sets of cooling measures and ramped up the supply of housing sites and the number of new public flats for sale. It was a tumultuous year to say the least.

While the events in the property market may not be as central as the General Election and Presidential Polls listed as first and second on the list, it has the potential to significantly affect the results of the two.

Fortunately, the impact of the most recent set of cooling measures appears to have yielded results for the time being at least.

Flash estimates released by the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) recently show that private housing prices edged up by only 2.7 per cent in Q4, down from 2.9 per cent in Q3, albeit taking the price index to a fresh high.

However, sales volumes have not dampened. Over 15,500 new private homes are estimated to have been sold last year - a new benchmark.

Over at the HDB market, prices of resale flats rose 2.4 per cent in Q4 2010 - a slower rate of growth than the 4 per cent increase in Q3 2010. But while the resale price index was pushed to yet another all-time record, transaction volumes fell.

The resale volume declined by about 21 per cent in Q4. The median COV amount is also estimated to have fallen by $7,000 or 23 per cent, from $30,000 in Q3 to $23,000 in Q4 2010. But prices of public housing resale flats are still going up.

With the region awash with liquidity and healthy economic growth, the upward trend of the property market is expected to continue in 2011.

The finalised set of market numbers will determine whether a new round of cooling measures is forthcoming.

However, even if prices remain stable, if sales of new homes continue to be very high, then the concern is that a lot of it may not be owner-occupier demand. This has strong ramifications for the rental market. If the cost of borrowings should suddenly shoot up, a crash cannot be ruled out even if our track record shows that we have always managed a soft landing.

To outsiders who are not familiar with our housing market, all of our current market indicators, including those on the economic front, are gelling together to produce what can be considered to be the perfect property bull run if there is such a thing.

It is a sign of the anxious times, when single-property owners have mixed feelings even as many are made millionaires on paper.

Personally, I am not so sure the effects of the latest set of cooling measures will last. Our housing market must be among the most open and attractive to investors all over the world.

Is it time for some measures regulating the amount of liquidity flowing into Singapore and into the local housing market? Can there be more focused cooling measures without affecting genuine buyers and sellers? Is it time to pool together all the data of all the various government bodies to get to the bottom of the "problem" if it has not already been done yet?

It is very difficult to suggest solutions if there are still big gaps on what we know about the market. If the gap persists should not there be greater efforts to plug them?

Much as I like speculators to learn from their mistakes, a crash benefits no one.

Personally, I am not in favour of changing the goal posts midway with respect to investors. It breeds uncertainty and affects investor confidence. As I see it, part of the problem is that the market does not appear to take the Government's warning - that it will not let the market overheat - seriously. Either that or it has short memories.

I prefer a more direct approach. Lay down all the cooling measures to be taken upfront. Have four sets, one for each quarter. Set the trigger points for each of them, say x per cent rise in the price index. If the price index surpasses this figure, the first set of cooling measures automatically kicks in and so on. The trigger points can be linked to fundamentals, say the percentage GDP growth for the previous quarter plus x per cent.

This should send a very clear message to investors. At the same time, the market has a choice; whether it wants to trigger the measures or not.



Colin Tan is head, research and Consultancy, at Chesterton Suntec International.

cashrich
18-01-11, 05:17
http://www.todayonline.com/Business/Property/EDC110114-0000182/Lay-down-the-cooling-measures-to-be-taken-upfront

Lay down the cooling measures to be taken upfront

by Colin Tan

Updated 11:11 AM Jan 14, 2011


In a Sunday feature article entitled "History-making year ahead", eight events and issues were highlighted by the writer which are expected to loom large in 2011. Seventh on the list was how to cool the property market without crashing it.

Last year, private housing prices eclipsed the previous 1996 peak, while the cash-over-valuation (COV) levels for public flats reached historic highs even as the Government unveiled two sets of cooling measures and ramped up the supply of housing sites and the number of new public flats for sale. It was a tumultuous year to say the least.

While the events in the property market may not be as central as the General Election and Presidential Polls listed as first and second on the list, it has the potential to significantly affect the results of the two.

Fortunately, the impact of the most recent set of cooling measures appears to have yielded results for the time being at least.

Flash estimates released by the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) recently show that private housing prices edged up by only 2.7 per cent in Q4, down from 2.9 per cent in Q3, albeit taking the price index to a fresh high.

However, sales volumes have not dampened. Over 15,500 new private homes are estimated to have been sold last year - a new benchmark. (How many are MM's? 50%?)

Over at the HDB market, prices of resale flats rose 2.4 per cent in Q4 2010 - a slower rate of growth than the 4 per cent increase in Q3 2010. But while the resale price index was pushed to yet another all-time record, transaction volumes fell.

The resale volume declined by about 21 per cent in Q4. The median COV amount is also estimated to have fallen by $7,000 or 23 per cent, from $30,000 in Q3 to $23,000 in Q4 2010. But prices of public housing resale flats are still going up.

With the region awash with liquidity and healthy economic growth, the upward trend of the property market is expected to continue in 2011.

The finalised set of market numbers will determine whether a new round of cooling measures is forthcoming.

However, even if prices remain stable, if sales of new homes continue to be very high, then the concern is that a lot of it may not be owner-occupier demand. This has strong ramifications for the rental market. If the cost of borrowings should suddenly shoot up, a crash cannot be ruled out even if our track record shows that we have always managed a soft landing.

To outsiders who are not familiar with our housing market, all of our current market indicators, including those on the economic front, are gelling together to produce what can be considered to be the perfect property bull run if there is such a thing.

It is a sign of the anxious times, when single-property owners have mixed feelings even as many are made millionaires on paper.

Personally, I am not so sure the effects of the latest set of cooling measures will last. Our housing market must be among the most open and attractive to investors all over the world.

Is it time for some measures regulating the amount of liquidity flowing into Singapore and into the local housing market? Can there be more focused cooling measures without affecting genuine buyers and sellers? Is it time to pool together all the data of all the various government bodies to get to the bottom of the "problem" if it has not already been done yet?

It is very difficult to suggest solutions if there are still big gaps on what we know about the market. If the gap persists should not there be greater efforts to plug them?

Much as I like speculators to learn from their mistakes, a crash benefits no one.

Personally, I am not in favour of changing the goal posts midway with respect to investors. It breeds uncertainty and affects investor confidence. As I see it, part of the problem is that the market does not appear to take the Government's warning - that it will not let the market overheat - seriously. Either that or it has short memories.

I prefer a more direct approach. Lay down all the cooling measures to be taken upfront. Have four sets, one for each quarter. Set the trigger points for each of them, say x per cent rise in the price index. If the price index surpasses this figure, the first set of cooling measures automatically kicks in and so on. The trigger points can be linked to fundamentals, say the percentage GDP growth for the previous quarter plus x per cent.

(If that is the case, it is not stablising, it is crashing. Who in the right mind would show hand? Also easy to play with index, rubbish in rubbish out)

This should send a very clear message to investors. At the same time, the market has a choice; whether it wants to trigger the measures or not.

How about Developer Lay down all the HEATING measures to be IMPLEMENTED upfront. Set the trigger points for each of them. Have four sets, one for each quarter. Set the trigger points for each of them, say X percent drop in sales each quarter. If the sales fails to meet this figure, the first set of price increase AUTOMATICALLY kicks in and so on. The trigger points can be linked to FUNDAMENTALS OF MICKEY MOUSE UNIT'S PSF, say the percentage PSF growth for the previous quarter plus X percent.


:tongue3:

Colin Tan is head, research and Consultancy, at Chesterton Suntec International.

Haha, best Statement. Developers should send a very clear message to buyers. At the same time, byers has a choice; whether it wants to exercise the options or not.

:doh:

Regulators
18-01-11, 10:12
So if the price index is to be used as the indicator, then it is high time all the ridiculous prices in jurong get corrected first. Lakefront at 1200psf is just absurd

teddybear
18-01-11, 12:10
The bidding price is also absurd! With high tender price, how can completed property price there not be high? Whose fault? Who didn't want to sell land cheaper in first place when developers want them? :banghead:


So if the price index is to be used as the indicator, then it is high time all the ridiculous prices in jurong get corrected first. Lakefront at 1200psf is just absurd

hopeful
18-01-11, 12:20
The bidding price is also absurd! With high tender price, how can completed property price there not be high? Whose fault? Who didn't want to sell land cheaper in first place when developers want them? :banghead:

Isn't it good if successful tender prices go higher and higher?
wouldn't new condos get more and more expensive?
won't "old" condos like we currently possessed, whether it is 1 yr old condo or 10 yr old condo, be pulled up also?

august
19-01-11, 09:02
the root problem is the govt does not seem keen to keep public housing affordable at all despite all the smoke and talk