PDA

View Full Version : Cooling measures need not be so ‘blunt’



reporter2
24-01-13, 13:02
http://www.todayonline.com/business/property/cooling-measures-need-not-be-so-blunt

Property

Cooling measures need not be so ‘blunt’

They should be more calibrated, rather than one-size-fits-all: Developer

By Conrad Maria Jayaraj

23 January


SINGAPORE — Property developer GuocoLand, the Singapore-listed firm controlled by Malaysian billionaire Quek Leng Chan, would like to see a more calibrated approach to property cooling measures by the Government rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.

Said its newly-appointed Chief Operating Officer, Mr Cheng Hsing Yao: “In a global landscape where Singapore is trying to attract foreign talent, this approach with a blunt instrument is certainly not the best one and may even scare people off. The Government should recognise that the property market here has become more sophisticated and is now very segmented.”

Earlier this month, the Government introduced a comprehensive round of additional cooling measures, including higher stamp duty for certain home buyers, tighter loan-to-value limits and higher downpayment requirements for existing home owners seeking to buy additional properties.

GuocoLand, which focuses mainly on the top end of the market, also feels that the Government should pay less attention to the private sector.

“It should concentrate on its role of providing affordable housing for the masses. It already caters to more than 80 per cent of the population compared with Hong Kong, where the public sector is less than 50 per cent,” said Mr Cheng. “If people can afford S$2 million EC (executive condominium) penthouses, they do not need government help. It should interfere in the remaining 20 per cent of the market as little as possible.”

While GuocoLand thinks that the current measures will have little adverse impact on its sector of the market, it expects sales across the industry to slow down but with prices staying broadly flat.

Most property observers appear to be in agreement with that view, with some expecting volume to take a dive, but as developers are now better capitalised and able to hold on to their inventory, at least for some time, prices are not expected to ease too much.

“With the tough new measures in place, demand by investors and foreigners will be curbed substantially. We may expect sales volume to decline by 30 to 40 per cent and prices stagnating in the near term,“ said Jones Lang LaSalle Property Consultants.

“In a way we are lucky that we made a decision some time ago to get out of the lower end of the private property market and concentrate on the top end,” said Ms Trina Loh, GuocoLand’s group head for Singapore.

As a result, the company remains optimistic about the various properties it has under development, including its massive Tanjong Pagar mixed development.

It bid S$1.7 billion at just over S$1,000 psf for the 99-year leasehold site next to Tanjong Pagar MRT Station. The project, which will feature Singapore’s tallest building at 290m, includes offices, a 200-room hotel and about 180 residences and retail space. It is expected to be completed towards the end of 2015 or early 2016.

Meanwhile, Ms Loh suggested that changing the system of having “reserve” prices on land sales might offer another way of moderating property prices. As the reserve price is based on historic property values and not the future outlook of the market, “perhaps we should look at auctions, like how Hong Kong conducts its land sales”.

Ms Loh was also not happy with the decision to start charging for private enclosed space (PES). In a hot climate, such open spaces provide some relief and charging for the space will discourage developers from providing such amenities, she feels.

“Just because some developers have abused the previous concessions given, now everybody is penalised. There’s a cost to providing these facilities and most of us regard additional charges as a recovery item.”

Under the latest measures, PES and private roof terraces will be treated as gross floor area (GFA).

GuocoLand thinks the latest efforts by the Government to cool the market are “unlikely to be its last”, especially in the current low interest rate environment.

acidic.straw
24-01-13, 14:28
"GuocoLand, which focuses mainly on the top end of the market, also feels that the Government should pay less attention to the private sector.

“It should concentrate on its role of providing affordable housing for the masses. It already caters to more than 80 per cent of the population compared with Hong Kong, where the public sector is less than 50 per cent,” said Mr Cheng."

If you live in public housing and you aspire to own private property so your family can enjoy the facilities and comfort that come with it, you would want the government to help you realise your dream. That is the difference b/t Singapore and Hongkong and what works for them need not automatically work for us.

If we adopt a laissez-faire system, then there will be many who will not realise this dream as foreign money will make a major sweep of private properties here. Such a policy will only benefit developers like Guocoland who don't really care whether you are a citizen or not so long as you buy from them.

Mr. Cheng has no vested interest in helping citizens realise their dreams. He should stick to thinking about how he can make property more attractive in view of the cooling measures instead of teaching us how to do things here. He can start with cutting down the humongous profits his company is making and lower the price of his development.

luzman
24-01-13, 14:50
"GuocoLand, which focuses mainly on the top end of the market, also feels that the Government should pay less attention to the private sector.

“It should concentrate on its role of providing affordable housing for the masses. It already caters to more than 80 per cent of the population compared with Hong Kong, where the public sector is less than 50 per cent,” said Mr Cheng."

If you live in public housing and you aspire to own private property so your family can enjoy the facilities and comfort that come with it, you would want the government to help you realise your dream. That is the difference b/t Singapore and Hongkong and what works for them need not automatically work for us.

If we adopt a laissez-faire system, then there will be many who will not realise this dream as foreign money will make a major sweep of private properties here. Such a policy will only benefit developers like Guocoland who don't really care whether you are a citizen or not so long as you buy from them.

Mr. Cheng has no vested interest in helping citizens realise their dreams. He should stick to thinking about how he can make property more attractive in view of the cooling measures instead of teaching us how to do things here. He can start with cutting down the humongous profits his company is making and lower the price of his development.


Totally agree....I have so far stayed in 2 of the Guocoland properties...they are certainly not what they think they are "Top end of the market"...the quality of those condos are just beyond my imagination for the prices they charged.

Laguna
24-01-13, 14:54
I will nvr buy their property anymore.....

teddybear
24-01-13, 19:51
1) You expect Govt to help those who aspire to own private property to realise their dream? Funny. Might as well ask govt to help those aspire earning $Million salary to achieve their dream?
I & my kakis dream of earning $100m a year, so can govt help us? :doh:

2) To aspire to own private property so that his family can enjoy the facilities and comfort that come with it, he should just work hard to achieve it. Which country's govt take it as their job to help their citizens live in dream home? If like that nobody needs to work hard anymore also can have dream home easily and enjoy life, don't need to work so hard, who want to work hard for themselves and in turn benefiting the country to increase their competitiveness viz-a-vz other countries? :scared-1:

3) What you advocated probably is suitable for a communist country? Why should everybody work hard in such a country? Might as well shake leg and wait for the person next door to do all the work! :rolleyes:



"GuocoLand, which focuses mainly on the top end of the market, also feels that the Government should pay less attention to the private sector.

“It should concentrate on its role of providing affordable housing for the masses. It already caters to more than 80 per cent of the population compared with Hong Kong, where the public sector is less than 50 per cent,” said Mr Cheng."

If you live in public housing and you aspire to own private property so your family can enjoy the facilities and comfort that come with it, you would want the government to help you realise your dream. That is the difference b/t Singapore and Hongkong and what works for them need not automatically work for us.

If we adopt a laissez-faire system, then there will be many who will not realise this dream as foreign money will make a major sweep of private properties here. Such a policy will only benefit developers like Guocoland who don't really care whether you are a citizen or not so long as you buy from them.

Mr. Cheng has no vested interest in helping citizens realise their dreams. He should stick to thinking about how he can make property more attractive in view of the cooling measures instead of teaching us how to do things here. He can start with cutting down the humongous profits his company is making and lower the price of his development.

kane
24-01-13, 22:40
PES this fat piece of bacon gone, all crying... too bad, so sad.

acidic.straw
25-01-13, 06:34
"1) You expect Govt to help those who aspire to own private property to realise their dream? Funny. Might as well ask govt to help those aspire earning $Million salary to achieve their dream?
I & my kakis dream of earning $100m a year, so can govt help us?"

What is wrong with Govt helping its citizens to realise their dreams? Govt play a key role in creating a conducive environment for its citizens to lead their lives according to their aspirations - be it in the areas of economic growth, health, law and order, religious freedom, security and defence, education, etc. Without such a conducive environment, few dreams can be realised - including earning $100M a year :D

"Which country's govt take it as their job to help their citizens live in dream home? If like that nobody needs to work hard anymore also can have dream home easily and enjoy life, don't need to work so hard, who want to work hard for themselves and in turn benefiting the country to increase their competitiveness viz-a-vz other countries?"

You wrongly equate "help" with "not working hard". Govt help does not mean giving handouts freely as in some countries. Govt help also means giving its citizens a leg up thru' creating conditions that make it conducive for them to pursue their goals including owning million dollar homes or earning $100m a year (Say if I want to earn $100m a year, I need to work hard to set up a business. Govt help thru' making business-friendly policies or providing an infrastructure conducive for doing business eg financial incentives, trade policies, training of workers, transport & communication facilities etc).

"What you advocated probably is suitable for a communist country? Why should everybody work hard in such a country?"


You're kidding right? Communism? I cannot fathom how you align communism with property ownership. :doh: Communism, is in fact, the diametric opposite of capitalism especially property ownership. :beats-me-man:



1) You expect Govt to help those who aspire to own private property to realise their dream? Funny. Might as well ask govt to help those aspire earning $Million salary to achieve their dream?
I & my kakis dream of earning $100m a year, so can govt help us? :doh:

2) To aspire to own private property so that his family can enjoy the facilities and comfort that come with it, he should just work hard to achieve it. Which country's govt take it as their job to help their citizens live in dream home? If like that nobody needs to work hard anymore also can have dream home easily and enjoy life, don't need to work so hard, who want to work hard for themselves and in turn benefiting the country to increase their competitiveness viz-a-vz other countries? :scared-1:

3) What you advocated probably is suitable for a communist country? Why should everybody work hard in such a country? Might as well shake leg and wait for the person next door to do all the work! :rolleyes:

JuzMe
25-01-13, 07:59
Hahaha, greed :tsk-tsk: Just buy without thinking. Sooner or later prices will come down and surprise so many people still stupidly buy or didn't sell to recognise profit :banghead: Now complaining this and that when measures are placed. Just like those who brought Apple shares at peak :scared-4:

Government hinted and publicly stated they will cool the market but still some still don't listen.

GREEDY :doh:

sgbuyer
25-01-13, 08:58
I think one major misconception of the cooling measures is that they are to make property more affordable for Singaporeans.

In my opinion, even though the government sells this point (for obvious reason I need not say), that is not the original intention. The cooling measures are designed to prevent excessive losses to Singapore banks should there be a financial crisis.

It is for this reason that the cooling measures are originally targeted at the high end investment market which incidentally is dominated by foreigners (PRs included).

History has shown that high end is more risky because buyers are often speculators. The risks goes to infinite if the buyer is a foreigner who can leave Singapore anytime and need not return.

Whereas a low end market buyer who purchases for own stay will be less likely to default on his or her payment. Even if there's a default, the buyer cannot run easily (unless a PR or foreigner) and will slough day and night to repay the debt.