PDA

View Full Version : White Paper’s implications for property market



reporter2
27-03-13, 16:04
http://www.todayonline.com/business/property/white-papers-implications-property-market

White Paper’s implications for property market

By Tan Chin Keong
-
15 March


The recently-published and hotly-debated Population White Paper highlights the key demographic, infrastructural and economic challenges facing Singapore over the next 20 to 30 years.

Specifically, it tries to balance the tricky demographic–infrastructure equation. On one hand are Singapore’s persistently low birth rate and consequent need for an immigrant population; on the other are growing concerns over the rising number of foreign residents and the overcrowding of public infrastructure.

In a bid to strike a favourable balance, the Government has laid out a vision to expand public transportation and housing infrastructure to cater to a population that is projected to grow to between 5.8 million and 6 million by 2020 and between 6.5 million and 6.9 million by 2030.

Among other things, the White Paper sets out plans to double the length of the MRT rail network to around 360km by 2030 and to allocate enough land to build 700,000 new homes by then.

While the population projection for 2030 seems like a huge leap from the current figure of 5.3 million, it translates to an annual growth rate of 1.1 to 1.5 per cent, much slower than the 2.5 per cent annual growth rate from 1980 to 2010.

Based on this projection, the Government expects the country’s economic growth rate to slow to an average of between 3 and 4 per cent a year from now until 2020, and to between 2 and 3 per cent a year from 2020 to 2030.

If the White Paper proposals are carried out as published, its impact on Singapore’s real estate sector is likely to be most keenly felt in the industrial and residential property markets.

Industrial property faces inevitable exodus

For the industrial property market, the slower population growth projection suggests that the tight immigration and foreign-labour policies currently in place will continue.

Thus, labour-cost inflation will likely remain high, potentially dealing a significant blow to labour-intensive manufacturing sectors.

Indeed, many of these industries, including food manufacturing, have voiced their concerns to the Government about the White Paper’s implications for the labour market.

Given the high industrial property prices and rentals in the current market, the outlook for tight labour conditions and slower economic growth over the long term gives manufacturing companies reasons to continue a trend that has recently developed: Relocating to lower-cost locations such as Iskandar Malaysia.

And given the current shortage of land in Singapore, the population projection, regardless of its low growth rate, implies that the Government will increasingly allocate land for higher-value-added commercial or residential purposes, rather than for industrial purposes.

This would make the relocation of manufacturing and industrial companies even more inevitable — a prospect that does not bode well for industrial property demand.

Residential property faces supply overhang

For the residential property market, if we take the mid-point of the longer-term population projection, Singapore will have 6.7 million people by 2030, an increase of 26 per cent from the current figure.

Meanwhile, the White Paper’s scenario of adding 700,000 new homes will bring the total housing stock to 1.9 million units by 2030, an increase of 58 per cent from the current number.

Even if we factor in the potential demolition of some 200,000 units that will be older than 50 years by 2030, the net increase of 500,000 still translates to a housing stock increase of 42 per cent.

Given that the potential increase in the housing supply outpaces the potential growth of the population, the White Paper has created concerns of oversupply in the residential market over the long term.

Singapore’s residential property market already faces a near-term increase of more than 30,000 units this year and 40,000 units next year.

The addition of 700,000 homes by 2030 would translate to a fresh supply of around 40,000 units a year until 2030.

Although this could potentially result in oversupply, the upshot is that it would prevent a repeat of the housing shortage that Singapore had experienced over the past decade.

Linking this to the potential expansion of the MRT system, increased housing supply would mean more homes being built around MRT stations in the future. Thus, residential units situated far from MRT stations may find themselves at a pricing disadvantage.

Tan Chin Keong is an analyst at UBS CIO Wealth Management Research.

matadorepy
27-03-13, 16:59
http://www.todayonline.com/business/property/white-papers-implications-property-market

White Paper’s implications for property market

By Tan Chin Keong
-
15 March


The recently-published and hotly-debated Population White Paper highlights the key demographic, infrastructural and economic challenges facing Singapore over the next 20 to 30 years.

Specifically, it tries to balance the tricky demographic–infrastructure equation. On one hand are Singapore’s persistently low birth rate and consequent need for an immigrant population; on the other are growing concerns over the rising number of foreign residents and the overcrowding of public infrastructure.

In a bid to strike a favourable balance, the Government has laid out a vision to expand public transportation and housing infrastructure to cater to a population that is projected to grow to between 5.8 million and 6 million by 2020 and between 6.5 million and 6.9 million by 2030.

Among other things, the White Paper sets out plans to double the length of the MRT rail network to around 360km by 2030 and to allocate enough land to build 700,000 new homes by then.

While the population projection for 2030 seems like a huge leap from the current figure of 5.3 million, it translates to an annual growth rate of 1.1 to 1.5 per cent, much slower than the 2.5 per cent annual growth rate from 1980 to 2010.

Based on this projection, the Government expects the country’s economic growth rate to slow to an average of between 3 and 4 per cent a year from now until 2020, and to between 2 and 3 per cent a year from 2020 to 2030.

If the White Paper proposals are carried out as published, its impact on Singapore’s real estate sector is likely to be most keenly felt in the industrial and residential property markets.

Industrial property faces inevitable exodus

For the industrial property market, the slower population growth projection suggests that the tight immigration and foreign-labour policies currently in place will continue.

Thus, labour-cost inflation will likely remain high, potentially dealing a significant blow to labour-intensive manufacturing sectors.

Indeed, many of these industries, including food manufacturing, have voiced their concerns to the Government about the White Paper’s implications for the labour market.

Given the high industrial property prices and rentals in the current market, the outlook for tight labour conditions and slower economic growth over the long term gives manufacturing companies reasons to continue a trend that has recently developed: Relocating to lower-cost locations such as Iskandar Malaysia.

And given the current shortage of land in Singapore, the population projection, regardless of its low growth rate, implies that the Government will increasingly allocate land for higher-value-added commercial or residential purposes, rather than for industrial purposes.

This would make the relocation of manufacturing and industrial companies even more inevitable — a prospect that does not bode well for industrial property demand.

Residential property faces supply overhang

For the residential property market, if we take the mid-point of the longer-term population projection, Singapore will have 6.7 million people by 2030, an increase of 26 per cent from the current figure.

Meanwhile, the White Paper’s scenario of adding 700,000 new homes will bring the total housing stock to 1.9 million units by 2030, an increase of 58 per cent from the current number.

Even if we factor in the potential demolition of some 200,000 units that will be older than 50 years by 2030, the net increase of 500,000 still translates to a housing stock increase of 42 per cent.

Given that the potential increase in the housing supply outpaces the potential growth of the population, the White Paper has created concerns of oversupply in the residential market over the long term.

Singapore’s residential property market already faces a near-term increase of more than 30,000 units this year and 40,000 units next year.

The addition of 700,000 homes by 2030 would translate to a fresh supply of around 40,000 units a year until 2030.

Although this could potentially result in oversupply, the upshot is that it would prevent a repeat of the housing shortage that Singapore had experienced over the past decade.

Linking this to the potential expansion of the MRT system, increased housing supply would mean more homes being built around MRT stations in the future. Thus, residential units situated far from MRT stations may find themselves at a pricing disadvantage.

Tan Chin Keong is an analyst at UBS CIO Wealth Management Research.

First n foremost, the next 17 years may not be like the last 17 years n progress as seen in the white paper may not be what you think. I believe S'pore going forward is not the same as fast forward twenty years ago to now. There are many implications .. Life is never the same again as before ..

Arcachon
27-03-13, 22:08
SGD 44,000 a year can never buy 2 PC from now onward.

JAFCO
28-03-13, 01:04
SGD 44,000 a year can never buy 2 PC from now onward.


If u see the 6.9 m is scary wait till u see the value of of sin dollar. 1m dollar house is norm how can the rent or pay of 2-3k be the norm? Its call stagflation.....the population increase is not helping to create jobs as it is it is helping to chase jobs with lower pay for the rich who are here....

JAFCO
28-03-13, 01:06
SGD 44,000 a year can never buy 2 PC from now onward.


If u see the 6.9 m is scary wait till u see the value of of sin dollar. 1m dollar house is norm how can the rent or pay of 2-3k be the norm? Its call stagflation.....the population increase is not helping to create jobs as it is it is helping to chase jobs with lower pay for the rich who are here....and the pap to stay in power with new voters....

ichigo55
31-03-13, 08:08
These are just planned figures ... Who can guarantee the pace of growth will be the same as the past 40 years ...
Even at current we have super hard time to even make good promise out of the 15k housing units and completion is now even more impaired by the lack of foreign labour .... I seriously doubt building can outpace the popu growth. The incoming 200k can only serve to fulfill the current popu ... If it is built in time.

dare2
31-03-13, 08:40
....a very simplistic assumption that housing demand i based solely on population growth....other factors such as singles buying homes, new families etc, not taking into account...another cooling campaign ad.....

lajia
31-03-13, 10:19
During good times when we experience high employment, ppl take things for granted and of course, they go for lifestyle issues...
When more ppl are out of jobs, then they will complain about basic needs...but whether good or bad times, we shouldn't forget about the fundamentals...

We are a small city with limited space and almost no resources except human. If we stop to reproduce enough to replace ourselves or to cope with fundamental demand of human resources generated from the economic growth, we will be doomed! As we have nothing to depend on. You can have all the greenery and space but, u will start to see more ppl lying and sleeping along the street.

How much resources is sufficient? How much economic growth would be sufficient to sustain our current chased lifestyle? Even if u pay another few thousand scholars with mil of dollars, we might still make mistakes in these calculation as environment is so dynamic.

Spare some thoughts as we complain and continue to be a complain city...:) :2cents: :2cents:

minority
31-03-13, 12:10
If u see the 6.9 m is scary wait till u see the value of of sin dollar. 1m dollar house is norm how can the rent or pay of 2-3k be the norm? Its call stagflation.....the population increase is not helping to create jobs as it is it is helping to chase jobs with lower pay for the rich who are here....and the pap to stay in power with new voters....


LOL... ur argument dont make sense, cents or logic.

1M dollor house depends what u are seeking? BTO is not 1M? 160K for 3 room and 330K for 5room.

u are taking the 1M marketing resale no.s to drive some scare tatics?

do you know wat is stagflation ?

" stagnation and inflation, is a term used in economics to describe a situation where an inflation rate is high, the economic growth rate slows down, and unemployment remains steadily high. It raises a dilemma for economic policy since actions designed to lower inflation may exacerbate unemployment, and vice versa."


Currently inflation is high due to internal and external factors. unemployment is low and economic growth is slowing ( partly self inflicted ).

precisely thats why we need economic growth! But the drive by the people wants demanding no foreigners thus driving out lower cost labour will push up inflation and slow economical growth. Which is thus we must increase productivity.

Productivity again cost $ i.e. automation , processes etc. which indirectly also fan inflation of services.

I dont see what is the problem with 6.9M as long we can increase the productivity that would also means with 6.9M at higher productivity our economy will be better. With that the people will also have better opportunity as more business strive better and expand too.

Thus I find ur argument flawed.

minority
31-03-13, 12:15
During good times when we experience high employment, ppl take things for granted and of course, they go for lifestyle issues...
When more ppl are out of jobs, then they will complain about basic needs...but whether good or bad times, we shouldn't forget about the fundamentals...

We are a small city with limited space and almost no resources except human. If we stop to reproduce enough to replace ourselves or to cope with fundamental demand of human resources generated from the economic growth, we will be doomed! As we have nothing to depend on. You can have all the greenery and space but, u will start to see more ppl lying and sleeping along the street.

How much resources is sufficient? How much economic growth would be sufficient to sustain our current chased lifestyle? Even if u pay another few thousand scholars with mil of dollars, we might still make mistakes in these calculation as environment is so dynamic.

Spare some thoughts as we complain and continue to be a complain city...:) :2cents: :2cents:

theses theys people get very short sighted. its a sign that we are doing well. everyone have a full stomach, comfy job and pay. Thus the itch to see some action and demand better.

The better should be work on with hard work as well as creativity.

Constant demand for free biz which some parities are leveraging will indirectly drive up cost (TAX) and impact our quality of life. The saying goes there are no free lunch. why are many constantly seeking/demand it? Coz they never understand that eventually it would be them or thier kids paying for it.