PDA

View Full Version : Govt releases new developer rules on show units, sales data



reporter2
26-05-15, 15:03
http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/real-estate/govt-releases-new-developer-rules-on-show-units-sales-data

Govt releases new developer rules on show units, sales data

By Lynette Khoo

[email protected] @LynetteKhooBT

May 19, 2015


LEGISLATIVE changes to the Housing Developers (Control and Licensing) Act will now require developers to provide detailed sales data on a weekly basis and disclose the value of any benefits to buyers in transaction documents. For the first time, the government is introducing a new set of rules to also ensure that developers accurately depict actual housing units in their showflats.

Amendments to the Act and the new set of rules on show units under the subsidiary legislation, Housing Developers Rules, will take effect from this month to "improve safeguards and provide more information to prospective purchasers of private residential properties", the Ministry of National Development (MND) said on Monday.

Augustine Tan, president of the Real Estate Developers' Association of Singapore (Redas), noted that developers that are already ensuring accurate representation in their showflats "will not have any issues" with the new rules.

"It's better for the buyers and we have no issues with that because we want the buyers to know exactly what they are getting. It's in the right direction," he said.

One of the show unit rules requires the floor area of the show unit to be the same as that of the actual housing unit; another rule requires all external and structural walls (both internal and external) of an actual unit to be depicted in the show unit. If any internal non-structural wall is not built in the show unit, the position, thickness and width of that wall must be clearly marked on the floor and labelled.

Existing show units that have been set up and open for viewing before July 20 will be exempted from the new show unit rules. But developers have to inform buyers of the differences between the show unit and the actual unit, prominently displaying a detailed list and description of the differences at the entrance of the show unit, and provide buyers a copy of that list.

"Some developers may not be very thrilled by some of these new rules, but they may be resigned to have to comply as it is now the law of the land," said SLP International executive director Nicholas Mak.

It is common for developers to create "optical illusions" in their showflats, such as thin markings on the floor to depict the walls and using the same tiles for the balcony and the living room to make the latter look bigger, he observed. "With the actual units getting smaller and smaller, developers try not to turn off the buyers and will ask the interior designer to come up with ways to make the unit not look too small."

A spokesman from the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) told BT that that developers will have to submit a declaration that the show units are set up in compliance with the requirements before opening the show units for viewing. The Controller of Housing will conduct spot checks to ensure that the developers build their show units according to the requirements.

"The developer will be required to close the show unit if it is not erected in compliance with the requirements in the Housing Developers (Show Unit) Rules," the spokesman said. "Further action, including suspension or revocation of licence, may also be taken against the developer. In the event that a licensed developer is found to have breached the rules, he shall be liable to a fine not exceeding S$5,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or to both."

There will also be less room for manoeuvring by developers when it comes to pricing tactics. From next Monday, housing developers must submit detailed sales data to the Controller of Housing every week. This will include sales volumes and transacted prices of individual units and the value of any benefits to buyers, including cash rebates, absorption of legal fees or stamp duties, rental guarantees and furniture vouchers. The information will be published on the URA website weekly from June 5.

The Option to Purchase and Sale & Purchase agreements - which are standard forms prescribed under the Housing Developers Rules - will also be amended with effect from July 20 to include more information, such as the value of any benefits that developers offer to buyers.

Buyers already have to declare any price discount, rebate or other benefit when seeking a home loan under the Monetary Authority of Singapore rules. In an ongoing lawsuit, however, UOB is suing a Lippo Group subsidiary and seven individuals for allegedly misleading the bank into granting inflated housing loans for 38 units at Marina Collection in Sentosa from 2011 to 2013 by not disclosing substantial furniture rebates.

Chia Siew Chuin, Colliers International director of research and advisory, said that discounts have always been difficult to quantify and ascertain. "With more detailed information, buyers can decide for themselves which type of discounts are the most beneficial to them, in real value terms."

But consultants flagged that there is a minor flipside to publishing weekly developers' sales data: Mr Mak felt that weekly data may be an "over-kill" and increase the work for some developers' staff; Ms Chia noted that property trends develop over the longer course of months, quarters to even a year.

"Buyers should take note that weekly information should be harvested for individual project details, rather than be used as an indication of wider market trends," Ms Chia added.

Developers told BT they were unsurprised by the changes, having largely complied since an amendment bill for the Housing Developers Act was read in 2013 in Parliament.

Cheang Kok Kheong, CEO of development and property at Frasers Centrepoint Limited, said that its recent showflats are in full compliance with the new rules. "We believe more regular updates of sales data will be beneficial for everybody including buyers and developers."

A spokesman from City Developments also said that the group is fully compliant with the new regulatory requirements. "Nevertheless, we are reviewing the announced revisions in detail and will implement various measures, where needed," he added.

Knight Frank executive director Tay Kah Poh noted that the new rules will curtail developers' flexibility to price according to business conditions and lay out their show units to highlight design possibilities.

"Singapore's control regime, in terms of disclosure, is probably one of the most onerous around, and these changes will add to the burden on developers to 'show their cards'," Mr Tay said. "But this seems to be in keeping with the prevailing regulatory mood for the authorities to ring fence consumers more and more against all manner of malpractices."

hopeful
26-05-15, 15:57
i wonder whether the new/amended law will protect Laguna in her case.
http://forums.condosingapore.com/showthread.php/13291-What-u-see-is-not-what-u-get

or protect these buyers from architect's mistakes
http://www.straitstimes.com/the-big-story/case-you-missed-it/story/condo-complaints-20140114
"Mr Chng Kiong Huat, executive director of property services at Far East Organization, which developed the project, said yesterday "the architect had not intended for two 'openable' windows for the second bedroom".
"An extra 'openable' window was inadvertently drawn in the as-built floor plan provided to Ms Koh. The error was subsequently corrected." The architect is RDC Architects"

developer first have to obtain bca building permit approval 1st before being allowed to sell.
however it seems that
1) developer can request further changes after approval
2) relevant authorities can request further changes after approval.
http://business.asiaone.com/news/sea-change-penthouse-pool-views-buyers-see-red
"A BCA spokesman said The Aristo's plans were amended after it approved the first set of plans.
The BCA then approved the amended plans."

http://forums.condosingapore.com/showthread.php/3359-The-Aristo-Amber-%28D15-FH%29/page238?p=491563&viewfull=1#post491563
"Apparently the missing Bay Windows was due to breach of Fire Safety Requirements, and the missing Water Feature and BBQ pit was not included in the S&P agreement, even though it was shown on brochure."

So will the new/amended law protect buyers' from "honest" mistakes, like architect's mistakes, brochure's mistakes, fire department's mistakes, bca's mistakes, developer's mistakes?

does anybody have any idea how far can the developer change the building plans after sale?
The showflat is based on approved building plan, developer do all things legally.
subsequently, developer requested for change in building plan afterwards and is approved.
Now does the new/amended law protect the buyers?

Kelonguni
26-05-15, 22:13
i wonder whether the new/amended law will protect Laguna in her case.
http://forums.condosingapore.com/showthread.php/13291-What-u-see-is-not-what-u-get

or protect these buyers from architect's mistakes
http://www.straitstimes.com/the-big-story/case-you-missed-it/story/condo-complaints-20140114
"Mr Chng Kiong Huat, executive director of property services at Far East Organization, which developed the project, said yesterday "the architect had not intended for two 'openable' windows for the second bedroom".
"An extra 'openable' window was inadvertently drawn in the as-built floor plan provided to Ms Koh. The error was subsequently corrected." The architect is RDC Architects"

developer first have to obtain bca building permit approval 1st before being allowed to sell.
however it seems that
1) developer can request further changes after approval
2) relevant authorities can request further changes after approval.
http://business.asiaone.com/news/sea-change-penthouse-pool-views-buyers-see-red
"A BCA spokesman said The Aristo's plans were amended after it approved the first set of plans.
The BCA then approved the amended plans."

http://forums.condosingapore.com/showthread.php/3359-The-Aristo-Amber-%28D15-FH%29/page238?p=491563&viewfull=1#post491563
"Apparently the missing Bay Windows was due to breach of Fire Safety Requirements, and the missing Water Feature and BBQ pit was not included in the S&P agreement, even though it was shown on brochure."

So will the new/amended law protect buyers' from "honest" mistakes, like architect's mistakes, brochure's mistakes, fire department's mistakes, bca's mistakes, developer's mistakes?

does anybody have any idea how far can the developer change the building plans after sale?
The showflat is based on approved building plan, developer do all things legally.
subsequently, developer requested for change in building plan afterwards and is approved.
Now does the new/amended law protect the buyers?

I don't think the law mentioned about windows number and location of windows. Only precise thickness of walls must be given or drawn clearly.

Please correct if my understanding is incorrect.

hopeful
27-05-15, 09:50
I don't think the law mentioned about windows number and location of windows. Only precise thickness of walls must be given or drawn clearly.

Please correct if my understanding is incorrect.

just read the Housing Developers (Show Unit) Rules 2015
too many details which are not specified which i think developers can exploit.

Section 6 is interesting
http://www.bca.gov.sg/BuildingPlan/building_plan_submission.html
how can any one department approve a project within a short span of time? or inspect every little details etc.
for eg, Fire safety department has to approve. But 2 examples given already, laguna's unit and the aristo where plans has to be changed later due to Fire safety.
So this is one big loophole for developer. get building plan approved first and then rectify later during construction.

Section 7 on misrepresentation.
won't it be easier to say, can only build blank show unit. WYSIWYG. no room for misrepresentation
that one will cut down on most of the other sections too.

IMO, this law have no bite. Buyers still have to start their civil suit against developer.

amk
27-05-15, 09:52
I don't think the law mentioned about windows number and location of windows. Only precise thickness of walls must be given or drawn clearly.


you failed to see the sarcasm of hopeful's post :)

the gist/irony of the story is this: developer can put whatever he wants, "following the rules", but nothing stops the developer from *changing* it *afterwards*, even after it is sold, or built, to whatever he likes, since the authority always "approves" anyway. In another words all these "rule compliant" requirement is meaningless as long as developer is allowed/"tolerated" to change things after it is "approved". Even an architect's as-built drawing can be claimed to be a "mistake" and changed afterwards and "approved", what is stopping the developer from changing the layout altogether claiming "it was a mistake in submission" ? So no, consumers still are at developer's mercy and have no protection.

hopeful did I get your drift correctly ? :)

hopeful
27-05-15, 11:08
amk, they make "honest" mistakes. lets move on :)

afaik, the only thing that is fixed in stone is the strata area purchased, (dimensions are not). and strata area purchased is also subject to 3% error.

I have been thinking alot about the 3% error. Given the advances in construction method, pre-cast,pre-built etc, why has the 3% tolerance not been changed since majulah singapura.

Can I market a 980sqft apartment as 1000sqft apartment, that still gives me a 10sqft margin allowance.
or put it as another way, given 3% tolerance, every 33 unit i built, i can sell an extra 1 unit pure profit.

or if I am more gungho developer, in order to maximise my profit, i will market a 960sqft as a 1000sqft apartment, if buyer find out, i refund the 10sqft price, but i get to utilise full 3% allowance and net result will still be 30sqft of pure profit (since no construction cost). (it is not 30-10 refund=20sqft of net profit).
If buyer didnt didnt find out, then i get to keep 40sqft of pure profit.

or if times are bad, that 3% tolerance allows me to price my unit lower. my construction cost is based on 980sqft, but i am selling it as a 1000sqft unit.


one good example.
http://www.straitstimes.com/the-big-story/case-you-missed-it/story/condo-complaints-20140114
on this waterfront waves condo, how the hell does "80 per cent of the 405 units had a size shortfall" ?
But I do like the reasons given "during construction, Frasers Centrepoint decided to set bay windows further back from the window ledge "to ensure water tightness", and move the railings further in from the balcony edge "for safety reasons",

and this guy is another bright "spark"
Mr Loi Hwee Yong, president of the land surveyor division of the Singapore Institute of Surveyors and Valuers (SISV), said these were "valid reasons" given the inevitable difficulty of translating plans on paper to concrete reality.
"There's not much savings involved so I don't think it was for the purpose of saving cost."

It is true, not much savings involved since construction cost for bay window and balcony is not high. However this bright "spark" didnt mention that the 1.4% air space is pure profit based on sales psf. Lets say net profit margin before shennanigans, is 15%, that 1.4% can boost the net profit by 10% to 16.4% after shennanigans.

amk
27-05-15, 12:37
totally. otherwise what makes you think in boom time everybody wants to be a "developer" ? easy money.
and btw the "size" of a unit is "subjected to surveying". plus minus 1/2 sqm can be easily achieved depending on way of classification of the fittings of ledges, lines, boundaries, etc.

Authority should enforce all unit floor plans to come with dimensions, just like HK ! It is impossible for a consumer to tell if his final unit is indeed "990 sqft". But it is very easy to tell if his master bedroom is "3.3m width 3.5m length" while the S&P floor plan shows "3.4m width 3.6m length". This gives consumer the basis in enforcing his rights. This is even more effective and better than "show room rules". Dun know why it is so difficult. Every HK condo brochure has detailed dimensions. So much better than SG

hopeful
27-05-15, 13:45
....
Authority should enforce all unit floor plans to come with dimensions, just like HK ! It is impossible for a consumer to tell if his final unit is indeed "990 sqft". But it is very easy to tell if his master bedroom is "3.3m width 3.5m length" while the S&P floor plan shows "3.4m width 3.6m length". This gives consumer the basis in enforcing his rights. This is even more effective and better than "show room rules". Dun know why it is so difficult. Every HK condo brochure has detailed dimensions. So much better than SG

HK condos project launch are definitely much better. Standardised format by the developers. aerial photos, floor plan, storey plans with dimensions. Also the authorities also have the layouts,plans, sales info, so can either download from developers' websites or the authorities' website.
In singapore, have to trawl the web to find out which one offer free download of plans without giving email info.

However in terms of building tolerance,
CAP 621 Residential Properties (First-hand Sales) Ordinance
http://www.legislation.gov.hk/blis_pdf.nsf/6799165D2FEE3FA94825755E0033E532/9A7F64F9111A25AB48257A320053DF54/$FILE/CAP_621_e_b5.pdf

pg 69
23. Despite anything contained in this Agreement, the Vendor reserves the right to alter the building plans
(if any) whenever the Vendor considers necessary Provided That the Vendor shall notify the Purchaser
in writing of such alteration if the same affects in any way the Property within 14 days after its having
been approved by the Building Authority. If, as a result of such alteration, the measurements of the
Property or any part of the Property according to such amended plans differs from the measurements of
the Property as set out in clause 18, then the purchase price shall be adjusted in proportion to the
variation of the measurements of the parts of the Property affected Provided That if the increase or
reduction in the measurements of the Property, or any part of the Property, exceeds 5% of the
measurements of the Property as set out in clause 18, then the Purchaser is at liberty to rescind this
Agreement, in which event all moneys paid by the Purchaser under this Agreement shall be returned to
the Purchaser with interest on those moneys at the rate of 2% per annum above the prime rate specified
by The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited from time to time from the date or dates
of payment to the date of repayment. The Purchaser shall exercise the right of rescission by notice in
writing to the Vendor within 30 days after the Purchaser is notified in writing by the Vendor of the
approval of such amended plans by the Building Authority, and if no such notice is received by the
Vendor within such time, the Purchaser is deemed to have accepted such plans.

Looks like the building tolerance in HK is 5% :)

singapore vs hong kong
sg developer dont inform you of plan changes, the govt give developer 3% tolerance. and if exceed 3%, reimburse you the excess of 3%.
hk developer have to inform you of plan changes, the govt give developer 5% tolerance. and if exceed 5%, only choice is to accept or rescind. If don't rescind, have to eat the entire loss of the more than 5%, no reimbursement of the excess of 5%.
and buyers better be more careful, if don't reply by 30days, deem to accept the plan change and eat the entire loss of the more than 5%.

so hongkong govt on one hand, order developers to give beautiful floor plans with dimensions, on the other hand it takes more away by giving 5% tolerance for developers and no compensation in excess of 5%. take it or leave it.

amk
27-05-15, 16:24
I dun see it this way.
HK buyers CAN rescind, that is a very big advantage. SG buyers simply cannot. HK way is at least open: I change the plan, if you are not happy, you can return.
And for the 5% seemingly "larger" tolerance, you forgot HK flat size includes "shared areas". With a common "utilization ratio" of about 85%, most of the "tolerance" came from the shared areas.

and btw you interpret it wrongly: HK buyers will be compensated *automatically* if the size diff is <5%. And if it is >5%, buyer can simply rescind and return the unit, and developer have to return you the money plus interest. (in SG, 3% is given free to developer!)


...then the purchase price shall be adjusted in proportion to the variation of the measurements ...

hopeful
27-05-15, 17:44
I dun see it this way.
HK buyers CAN rescind, that is a very big advantage. SG buyers simply cannot. HK way is at least open: I change the plan, if you are not happy, you can return.
And for the 5% seemingly "larger" tolerance, you forgot HK flat size includes "shared areas". With a common "utilization ratio" of about 85%, most of the "tolerance" came from the shared areas.

and btw you interpret it wrongly: HK buyers will be compensated *automatically* if the size diff is <5%. And if it is >5%, buyer can simply rescind and return the unit, and developer have to return you the money plus interest. (in SG, 3% is given free to developer!)

is "shared areas" same as "non-saleable" areas?
hmm, what is saleable areas and non-saleable areas?
edited: it looks like common areas are no longer part of saleable area anymore. the definition of saleable area has been standardised since 2008


as for the misintepretation part, it is caused by lack of punctuation.
"... the parts of the Property affected Provided That if the..." 2 capital letter yet no punctuation.
so is it
A) "... the parts of the Property affected. Provided that if the..."
B) "... the parts of the Property affected provided that if the..."
if there is 0% tolerance, then yes, HK definitely give more assurance to the buyer.

on further reading, non-saleable areas are air-conditioning plant room, bay window, cockloft, flat roof, garden, parking space, roof, stairhood, terrace, yard. is non-saleable area part of the strata area in HK?