PDA

View Full Version : Shunfu Ville deal revives collective-sale dreams



reporter2
07-06-16, 19:09
http://www.straitstimes.com/business/property/shunfu-ville-deal-revives-collective-sale-dreams

Shunfu Ville deal revives collective-sale dreams

Jun 6, 2016

Rennie Whang


The Shunfu Ville en bloc sale late last month has given some owners of ageing homes hope that they can reap a collective sale bonanza.

Property consultants said inquiries started coming in from estates shortly after the Shunfu Ville announcement, while efforts are already under way at other blocks.

"There is interest from developers, which is why we are stepping up our search for suitable engagements or projects," said JLL international director Karamjit Singh, who brokered the Shunfu Ville sale and Thong Sia Building sale last year.

The 358-unit privatised Housing and Urban Development Company (HUDC) estate near Marymount MRT station was sold for $638 million last month, the first en bloc sale in nearly a year and the largest since 2007. Each owner will pocket about $1.782 million, or nearly 50 per cent above the typical value of a unit on its own.

It was a shot in the arm for an otherwise moribund en bloc sales market, with just mixed-use Thong Sia Building sold last year, for $380 million, and no en bloc sales in 2014. In comparison, a record $11.6 billion of collective sales took place in 2007 at the market peak.

The Shunfu Ville deal was struck on Thursday, after about 81 per cent of owners agreed to lower the reserve price from $688 million to $638 million.

Elsewhere, the Changi Garden condominium and a former HUDC project in Potong Pasir are already into the sale process.

The collective sale committee at the mixed-development Changi Garden off Upper Changi North Road selected lawyers and a marketing agent last month. The 84-unit estate has tried going en bloc twice but came up short both times.

Some residents of The Capri condominium in Stevens Road are also said to be exploring the option, having sent out invitations to quote.

Among privatised HUDC estates, the collective sale committee at Blocks 110 to 112 Potong Pasir Avenue 1 is collecting signatures from owners and has apparently obtained about 60 per cent of the required minimum 80 per cent approval.

The collective sale committee at former HUDC project Tampines Court is drafting a sale agreement, while residents of former HUDC project Eunosville are said to be considering reigniting the process.

Both estates have attempted to go en bloc twice. The 560-unit Tampines Court was privatised in 2002 and the 330-unit Eunosville in 2011.

"Owners of privatised HUDC developments are under pressure as their estates grow older and the responsibility of upgrading rests on their shoulders now," said Mr Lee Liat Yeang, a senior partner in the real estate practice group of Dentons Rodyk & Davidson.

"As time passes, the value of topping up the lease (of site) will go up and, correspondingly, the amount of money that goes to owners in an en bloc sale will come down," added Mr Lee, who is acting for Qingjian Realty in the Shunfu Ville deal.

On the retail front, owners at Katong Shopping Centre have reached the 80 per cent mandate for a collective sale and are expected to launch the site soon. The landmark in the Katong area is zoned for commercial and residential use.

Now may be a reasonable time to start a collective sale effort as the Government has been moderating its supply of land via its sales programme. Not all of the Government Land Sales (GLS) sites are attractive; they may be too big or highly contested, said Ms Alice Tan, Knight Frank Singapore's research head.

That said, the GLS programme for the second half of this year, likely to be announced this week or next, could offer developers attractive alternatives, according to Mr Desmond Sim, CBRE's head of research for Singapore and South-east Asia.

While developers see the en bloc process as a viable source of well-located sites, they will be realistic in their offering prices, given building completion and sales deadlines imposed by the Qualifying Certificate and Additional Buyer's Stamp Duty.

Eventually, it is about pricing, said Mr Shaun Poh, Cushman & Wakefield's executive director of capital markets (Singapore), adding: "Developers are low on their land stocks so quite a number will be keen to restock. But they are also very mindful of whatever sales backlog they may have."

Arcachon
12-10-16, 19:07
http://www.tampinescourt.net/2016/10/shunfu-ville-going-to-high-court.html

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-nOAZMDfmj_4/V_27VKybS8I/AAAAAAAAGEY/ROOuCsVT0_8yoQUOSDsEF9R8C65iQDAaQCLcB/s1600/Shunfu%2BVille%2Bfaces%2Bhiccups%2Bafter%2Bsale.png

Arcachon
12-10-16, 20:52
https://scontent-hkg3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14731371_10208631664401965_7719892165668878624_n.jpg?oh=9e9deca3464f56f5f65f1df6405bc2fb&oe=58A77C40

B. The Date of Purchase or Acquisition
If a residential property is purchased on or after 20 Feb 2010, SSD is payable if the residential property is sold within the holding period.

On and after 14 Jan 2011
Up to 1 year 16%
More than 1 year and up to 2 years 12%
More than 2 years and up to 3 years 8%
More than 3 years and up to 4 years 4%
More than 4 years No SSD payable

SSD is computed by applying the requisite SSD rate on the selling price or the market value of the property as at the date of sale or disposal, whichever is higher.

1,782,000 of SSD to be pay

Arcachon
12-10-16, 21:09
https://scontent-hkg3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14650572_10208631743963954_1483731159147292878_n.jpg?oh=e2966eeb334112b171b3d9cde82d05ba&oe=586AFD91

Kelonguni
12-10-16, 21:47
Who still dares to buy old resale?

Arcachon
12-10-16, 22:10
Who still dares to buy old resale?

Should be no problem for the FAMOUS 5.

High Court will be at their side.

"At the moment, it can go either way. The sale application will be allowed if the grounds of objection are not valid. But if it is proven that there's been bad faith in the committee's handling of the matter, if any of the five suffer financial loss, then the courts will have no choice but to turn down the application."

http://www.straitstimes.com/business/property/shunfu-ville-faces-hiccups-after-sale

Arcachon
12-10-16, 22:37
https://scontent-hkg3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14721717_10208632267137033_3467524257677039192_n.jpg?oh=13932650b5f062d3677cc82cc44d1dfb&oe=586897C1

Next one will be the Famous 3 from Raintree Garden

cartman
12-10-16, 22:50
looks like the rest of the owners may have to chip in for their ssd if they want the deal to proceed smoothly

Kelonguni
12-10-16, 23:27
How the case moves will also set precedence for future enbloc.

My gut feel is that SSD should already have been made known to them at the point of sale. So objection should be overruled.

Getting 80% signatures is quite tough le. Why make it even more cumbersome.

peppertail
13-10-16, 00:42
Just because some of the owners need to pay SSD does not mean they will have a financial loss. The other owners will only need to chip in if the net sales proceeds are insufficient to cover the allowable deductions (bank loan+CPF+SSD+Privatisation fee). The CPF board doesn't actually require you to make good any shortfalls. From the tables above i don't see how any of the owners can suffer a financial loss. This was a prominent precedent: http://www.mnd.gov.sg/stb_appfiles/judgment/archive/2006/STB_68_of_2006_-_Waterfront_View_(5_Feb_2007).pdf

Arcachon
13-10-16, 06:46
Just because some of the owners need to pay SSD does not mean they will have a financial loss. The other owners will only need to chip in if the net sales proceeds are insufficient to cover the allowable deductions (bank loan+CPF+SSD+Privatisation fee). The CPF board doesn't actually require you to make good any shortfalls. From the tables above i don't see how any of the owners can suffer a financial loss. This was a prominent precedent: http://www.mnd.gov.sg/stb_appfiles/judgment/archive/2006/STB_68_of_2006_-_Waterfront_View_(5_Feb_2007).pdf

That was before 2010 Act

Kelonguni
13-10-16, 07:30
We also discussed here the potential risk for enbloc as one key factor against an old property, Freehold or Leasehold. But LH owners are more likely to be realistic so the chance of enbloc is quite high if over 30 years old.

Kelonguni
13-10-16, 10:03
http://www.iea.sg/news-66

peppertail
13-10-16, 11:19
That was before 2010 Act

What were the changes made in 2010?

Arcachon
13-10-16, 11:57
What were the changes made in 2010?

http://www.mnd.gov.sg/stb/GeneralInformation.html

peppertail
13-10-16, 12:13
http://www.mnd.gov.sg/stb/GeneralInformation.html

Nothing in there with regards to allowable deductions to determine financial loss.