by her definition, HDB surely is an investment vehicle liaoOriginally Posted by linchong84
so how to say HDB is public housing and shd be affordable?
conflict of interest liao...
JUST BOO BOO HER OFF LOR...hehehehehe
by her definition, HDB surely is an investment vehicle liaoOriginally Posted by linchong84
so how to say HDB is public housing and shd be affordable?
conflict of interest liao...
JUST BOO BOO HER OFF LOR...hehehehehe
Don't worry... forumers here are not so easily agitated, just very kapo to want to discuss about such articles ... even if too old and need bypass, just call KBW and tell him you need that same subsidy he had.Originally Posted by linchong84
he prolly refering to wenqing only la....Originally Posted by ysyap
the rest of us ok one la....
smtimes get a little heated up lor like i mentioned smbody's wifey....ops...my bad la...
She is giving govt 3 routes to choose from:
1. give her good and cheap bto like dawson.
2. if cannot, then she will still take lousy punggol, jurong, yishun bto. but remove the mop so that she can rent out and gek power to buy pte.
3. if still cannot, then she will threaten to leave (who needs her anyway)..
it's just like your young children.. when they want you to buy toy A or toy B and you refuse to, they will make a scene at the toy shop and cry out loud refuse to leave to attract public attention.. so parents also got 3 ways to deal with this kind of children..
1. give in to them and buy the toy. Eventually, they will know once they cry, you will give in.. and they will always cry to make u give in every single time they want something.. and they will grow up being very dependent and spoilt..
2. dun give in to them and beat the hell out of them in public.. the public will think you are a bad parent who mistreats the child and condemn you..
3. dun give in to them but give them fake promises and sooth them to go home peacefully without making a scene.. when they reach home and no more public eyes, whack the hell out of them so that next time they dare not make noise in the public again..
i think govt is doing (3) which is good haha..
Hahaha!Originally Posted by devilplate
So you mean she's been asked to go into the boss's room the next day after her article was published? Hahaha! Let's see how her next article will sound or will she even ever get to write again?Originally Posted by linchong84
It's an SPH journalist leh.........sounds suspiciously like a planted article to me to take a swipe at Gen Y......Originally Posted by linchong84
Then again, it's also true that condo fever has swept many Gen Y. I can never understand why couples < $10k want to go the condo route straight away, instead of BTO/ECs?
Agreed. They should climb, progressing from one to the next, otherwise they'll soon discover the great financial burden when kids come along, etc! Overcommitment is . Their mindset must be guided and educated...Originally Posted by yaozong7
i overheard smthing when i visit EC showflatOriginally Posted by yaozong7
a yng couple looking at the model happily and shows great interest....den i overheard their conversation wif their mother....their mom says go get punggol BTOs la....300k 4rm flat so cheap n affordable ....y buy 6xxk ECs?
hehe...pardon me as i am not a gd story teller(its a true story)
tats y ended up low birth rate lorOriginally Posted by ysyap
Unfortunately many couples are tempted by the facilities on offer and totally ignore their financial muscles! Well its their choice after all! This is what the govt can offer and so long as they don't make ridiculous demands (give them one inch they ask for one mile), then I guess its still ok. But I must add that the mother is prudent. She sees further but the same may not be repeated for many other young couples!Originally Posted by devilplate
I think the mum is giving the wrong advice.. 6xxk EC is affordable to young couple ma.. Now inflation so high, keep the money in bank or cpf for what??Buy BTO or EC can.. Buy DBSS is a big no no..Originally Posted by ysyap
if the yng couple can buy bto meaning they r earning less den 8k mah.....EC is more for 8-10k group of 1st timer mahOriginally Posted by linchong84
Hmm true.. If still <8k maybe shouldn't tax themselves too hard.. But BTO not easy to strike..Originally Posted by devilplate
Well you don't know the context mah... maybe they have cash but don't want to spend on DBSS or EC but invest in some other stuff instead of putting into bank!Originally Posted by linchong84
u use a "normal salaryman" as your example for japan. so likewise i use myself as an example, which is of cos not representative of majority sporean public housing buyers. i may need reading glasses but u might need reading brains. LOLOriginally Posted by masterkey
BTO not easy to strike also got 50-50 or 1 in 2 chance of getting for a project which is two times oversubscribed. Much better than toto which is like 1 in 600 000 chance of winning.Originally Posted by linchong84
you should stop making a fool out of yourself.Originally Posted by august
As expected, HDB resale price index up in Q2:
HDB’s flash estimate of the 2nd Quarter 2011 Resale Price Index (RPI) is 179.9, an increase of 2.9% over 1st Quarter 2011
The index is a laggard, reflecting txns done 3 months ago ... now th index should be already 183-185. I expect index to hit close to 200 at the peak.
Ride at your own risk !!!
By year end? or next year end?Originally Posted by phantom_opera
Not forgetting, no clean water or maybe that time already have, no jobs, no MRT, screw up bus with no air con, no shopping center and many many more.... It is like Vietnam. Nowadays, people are so greedy and really damn stupid. Want to buy first world country flats at Vietnam prices. Knn
Originally Posted by devilplate
If they really want, I think should have MOP 20 years and sell them at 100k.
Originally Posted by devilplate
For those who strike, 33% rejected a flat.
So are those whiners really in need of a flat? Not forgetting, 90% of the 33% who rejected are first timer.
This Gen is too greedy. Want to have no MOP, then their father buy or rent from them ah? Want to stay near parents (Serangoon) but yet apply in Dawson. Ridiculous.
Also, there will always be a few who are really having very low income but it can't be helped. As long as majority needs are met, then I think it is good enough.
Lazy and stupid
Originally Posted by linchong84
Think the new balloting system takes into consideration the number of times a balloter rejects. Those who reject before will be behind in priority as compared with those who haven't rejected. The highest priorities goes to those who were unsuccessful in their previous attempts!Originally Posted by thomastansb
I highly suspect so! From wat i gathered so far on the ground....Originally Posted by ysyap
So dun anyhow apply n reject for the very first time
Originally Posted by thomastansb
Thats only IF you dont have a family or any elderly parents to take care, and you dont believe you ever need to have a retirement plan.
It appears BT has understated the land sale price. If this is correct, the profit margin is not as high as initially thought, more like 5-7% than a whopping 70+%
http://info.sgx.com/webcoranncatth.nsf/VwAttachments/Att_18254373848B707B482578BF002C0CFE/$file/Clarify.BT.article_2011-06-30.pdf?openelement
SIM LIAN GROUP LIMITED
(Company Registration No. 200004760C)
CLARIFICATION OF BUSINESS TIMES ARTICLE PUBLISHED ON 30 JUNE 2011
The Board of Directors of Sim Lian Group Limited (the “Company”) refers to the Business Times article entitled “Profit margins for DBSS developers ‘look high’” published on 30 June 2011 and wishes to clarify that the land price of $82,222,000 and the maximum GFA of
721,188 square feet for our project Centrale 8 are incorrect and therefore the profit and gross profit margin are correspondingly incorrect.
The land price for Centrale 8 is $178,128,000 as stated in our announcement no. 112 of 3 August 2010 and the maximum permissible Gross Floor Area is 682,384.9 square feet as stated in our announcement no. 164 of 6 August 2010.
By Order of the Board
Ang Lay Hua
Company Secretary
Sim Lian Group Limited
30 June 2011
This is not what I am trying to say. My point is that Singaporeans are fussy. 33% rejected when they are given a choice. That is the main point.
Originally Posted by ysyap
Suddenly, it is everyone else fault for you not earning enough
Originally Posted by Jadey
http://mndsingapore.wordpress.com/20...ing-but-false/
Startling But False
I was startled when I read the front page article in the Business Times “Profit margins for DBSS developers ‘look high’ ” (Jun 30). It alleged that the DBSS developer’s profit margin for Centrale 8 was 76%, even after it had reduced its highest selling price by over $100,000.
I thought it could not be right and had it checked. Sure enough, the article was fraught with serious errors.
For example, it quoted a land price of $82,222,000 and a maximum GFA of 721,188 square feet for the project. Both figures were wrong. The correct figures were respectively $178,128,000 and 682,385 square feet. This was a huge difference of almost $100 million. The errors led to a gross over-estimation by BT of the developer’s profit and gross profit margin.
Based on these figures alone, the profit margin would have been 26%, not 76%.
But even the reduced figure was wrong, as the article had excluded key cost items such as financing, marketing and administrative costs. These are significant costs and when included, would have further lowered the profit margin for all the DBSS projects listed in the article.
I have been in MND for 5 weeks, and not sleeping well. I am working my guts out to try to calm the market, for the good of all Singaporeans.
But I can’t do it alone. I need all to help.
HDB architects are working round the clock to ramp up BTO supply. Contractors are building up capacity to deliver the flats on time. HDB is setting BTO prices carefully to help guide the market.
I hope our media can do their part too. There is some panic buying out there, by people worried that prices will continue to rise. Sensationalised articles will merely feed the frenzy.
If only BT had verified the facts, the misleading article could have been avoided. Please help to circulate this blog to your friends.