Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 52

Thread: calls for 'timely review' of property tightening measures

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    933

    Default calls for 'timely review' of property tightening measures

    what if govt review and implement more drastic measures?

    http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking...ry_711113.html

    Redas calls for 'timely review' of property tightening measures

    The Real Estate Developers Association of Singapore (Redas) said that it hopes the government will initiate a 'timely review' of the various market tightening measures.

    Redas president Wong Heang Fine said at the association's Mid Autumn Festival at Shangri-la Hotel on Friday that this will help avoid artificially suppressing genuine demand for private properties here.

    He added that Redas hopes that the government will continue its pragmatic approach and moderate its land sale through the reserve list.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,089

    Default

    REDAS urges govt to review property market tightening measures
    By Joanne Chan | Posted: 09 September 2011

    SINGAPORE: The Real Estate Developers' Association of Singapore (REDAS) has raised concerns over a potential oversupply of private homes in the near term, especially with the uncertain global outlook.

    It is urging the government to review its land sales programme to ensure that new supply is introduced only when the market is confident of absorbing it.

    With the possibility of demand for private homes dropping due to an economic downturn, developers are pointing to the need to rein in supply.

    In the second half of this year, the government will put up for sale 17 private residential sites under the Confirmed List of the Land Sales Programme.

    Including recent sites sold, an estimated 53,000 private homes will hit the market over the next few years.

    To ensure a more sustainable market, REDAS wants the government to moderate its land sales by putting more sites on the Reserve List system instead of the Confirmed List.

    That way, land is put up for tender only when there is sufficient interest.

    REDAS president Wong Heang Fine said: "The Reserve list actually works well because all of us can actually trigger the land sales and each of us can then look at the particular site a bit more carefully.

    "So the Reserve List allows some flexibility, whereas in the Confirmed List, the government would have to sell the site, irrespective of market conditions."

    Group CEO of Frasers Centrepoint, Lim Ee Seng, echoed this sentiment. Mr Lim said there is "adequate" supply in the market and he does not see the need for more sites to be introduced in the near term.

    For now, developers are still optimistic that demand will hold.

    Kwek Leng Beng, executive chairman of City Developments, said: "I mean you put the money in the bank, you are getting very little interest. If you buy stocks and shares, volatility is so great.

    "So you have (an) alternative investment asset, and I think that's good if you can diversify. But as I've emphasised, don't buy if you cannot pay."

    REDAS also urged the government to review the various property cooling measures introduced so as to avoid artificially suppressing genuine demand.

    While take up rates for property launches are still relatively strong, developers said market conditions could change in the next three to six months.

    - CNA/cc/al
    http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stori...152072/1/.html

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,823

    Default Buyers Associations

    Buyers need to form an association as well. We can then refuse to pay anything more than 10% premium from the Developers break even cost.

    We can also invite KBW for tea and share with him how many voters we are representing.

    Thanks,
    Richard

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    8,013

    Default

    The clearest sign to date that developers are getting concerned! 2011 may well end on a high for ppty prices but 2012 is still a . Hmmmm...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    5,675

    Default

    Most probably they are more concerned on how to sell their overbidded land haa haa....

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    823

    Default

    he scared his bishan cannot sell at 1.5kpsf

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    8,013

    Default

    Looking at how crazy buyers in Singapore are, the Bishan plot should do pretty well lah!!! But how long more can such momentum persist? They better quickly launch that project before some measures get implemented or some thing happens.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    5,675

    Default

    "Developers shall be punished" as promised by MBT.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    2,890

    Default

    The more they ask for

    The more they will have to pay...

    who ask them to be the evil one in the first place?

    Take note.. they are crying for mercy before being slaughther with cheaper, better and faster BTOs.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    823

    Default

    haha interesting to read the quotes of the 3 CEOs..

    Can tell crapland is very scared because its bishan site might be launching in the next couple of months..

    also can tell frasers scared because its punggol 1billion site not launched yet..

    cdl seems quite cool abt it.. what do they have in their land bank now? empty liao ah?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    8,013

    Default

    Let's see how these developers will respond with great deals and bargains! Biggest winners may well be the buyers or so I thought!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    533

    Default

    KBW probably is worried now..all developers retreat and build housing outside sillypore

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,841

    Default

    For properties near mrt, there will still be buyers rushing into the showrooms like seow kao to snap up units, evident from many projects including treasure trove. Developers know that so mrt land will continue to rise in prices economic downturn or not. The only time when developers will lower prices if jobs are hit and majority of singaporeans face bread n butter issues, which I don't foresee it happening.
    Quote Originally Posted by ysyap
    Let's see how these developers will respond with great deals and bargains! Biggest winners may well be the buyers or so I thought!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    616

    Default

    I find the developers really stupid.

    What are they saying????

    Is the prices going to go up or down???

    One hand tell buyers say price will go up so faster buy. The other hand tell URA prices will fall so don't release land. like that also can.....

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    9,217

    Default

    I thought developers are telling garment to consider lifting the CMs in anticipation of the US and Euros economy as it is likely for Singapore to go into technical recession closer to the end of the year. Otherwise, market will fall badly.
    Quote Originally Posted by wind30
    I find the developers really stupid.

    What are they saying????

    Is the prices going to go up or down???

    One hand tell buyers say price will go up so faster buy. The other hand tell URA prices will fall so don't release land. like that also can.....

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,482

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wind30
    I find the developers really stupid.

    What are they saying????

    Is the prices going to go up or down???

    One hand tell buyers say price will go up so faster buy. The other hand tell URA prices will fall so don't release land. like that also can.....
    I think they are thinking they want sales momentum to relieve them from their cash drain of holding land at high prices. They could hoard units at those prices but it's totally unproductive use of capital.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    9,217

    Default

    Sim Lian at ATT has already broken and make money from Friday. Local projects of large developers, CDL and Capitaland, is sure win but not overseas projects in China, Vietnam, etc..
    Quote Originally Posted by kane
    I think they are thinking they want sales momentum to relieve them from their cash drain of holding land at high prices. They could hoard units at those prices but it's totally unproductive use of capital.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,482

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DC33_2008
    Sim Lian at ATT has already broken and make money from Friday. Local projects of large developers, CDL and Capitaland, is sure win but not overseas projects in China, Vietnam, etc..
    Those who bid for land at lower prices are still ok. Those who bid at high prices will be asking for review of cooling measures.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    9,217

    Default

    It is REDAS role to wayang and speak out for the smaller developers. Big boys like FEO, CDL and Capitaland have no problem with holding.
    Quote Originally Posted by kane
    Those who bid for land at lower prices are still ok. Those who bid at high prices will be asking for review of cooling measures.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,810

    Default

    Supply > Demand = Prices drop. I think this is what lots of people have in their mind. So I think govt is trying to release more lands to increase the supply of the pte ppty, hoping that the ppty market will adjust the price by itself because govt cannot control the price of the pte ppty. But what will happen if supply is so much more than demand, then it might not be so good for the economy, don't they not afraid that it might end up like USA. But what happen if the developers have the holding power, then the pte ppty market will still remain strong.
    Last edited by irisng; 11-09-11 at 11:30.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    9,217

    Default

    We are not the same as US as we are smaller, etc. Garment will not allow prices to free-fall cost we will loose all our investors.
    Quote Originally Posted by irisng
    Supply > Demand = Prices drop. I think this is what lots of people have in their mind. So I think govt is trying to release more lands to increase the supply of the pte ppty, hoping that the ppty market will adjust the price by itself because govt cannot control the price of the pte ppty. But what will happen if supply is so much more than demand, then it might not be so good for the economy, don't they not afraid that it might end up like USA. But what happen if the developers have the holding power, then the pte ppty market will still remain strong.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    8,013

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wind30
    I find the developers really stupid.

    What are they saying????

    Is the prices going to go up or down???

    One hand tell buyers say price will go up so faster buy. The other hand tell URA prices will fall so don't release land. like that also can.....
    It is the agents who are telling buyers price will go up so faster buy, not the developers. It is also these same agents who are telling sellers price will come down so faster sell! Make sense?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,482

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ysyap
    It is the agents who are telling buyers price will go up so faster buy, not the developers. It is also these same agents who are telling sellers price will come down so faster sell! Make sense?
    They just want to churn. Dead market is bad business for them.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    653

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by linchong84
    cdl seems quite cool abt it.. what do they have in their land bank now? empty liao ah?

    CDL might not have much in the land bank, but I believe Kwek's privately held hong leong holdings still own a sizable land bank in Singapore.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    9,217

    Default

    I guess CDL is consolidating for the next move. Their shares are still fine even with the recent bad news from US and Euros. Should drop tomorrow.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jadey
    CDL might not have much in the land bank, but I believe Kwek's privately held hong leong holdings still own a sizable land bank in Singapore.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,823

    Default Developer is selling

    One of senior managers in CapitalLand has sold his own property and rents to stay. That's the equivalent for shorting the property market.
    Maybe he knows something we don't ... or he is taking action on something well known.

    Thanks,
    Richard

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,482

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by richwang
    One of senior managers in CapitalLand has sold his own property and rents to stay. That's the equivalent for shorting the property market.
    Maybe he knows something we don't ... or he is taking action on something well known.

    Thanks,
    Richard

    if you know him just ask him directly what he's thinking, then no need to second guess.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    803

    Default

    He probably owns a few units and decided to sell one to buy a new Aston Martin?

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    8,013

    Default

    If what he knows prompted him to sell his own roof and start to rent, then it must either be really huge or he just simply dislike his current place and so decided to sell when time is still relatively good. It shouldn't be that big otherwise not only one senior management personnel will sell but the entire team. Again, with SSD, it complicates things! Seriously, selling one's house does not imply alot!

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    9,217

    Default

    This is not worrysome! We have to be worried if the CEO of Capitaland is selling all his properties.
    Quote Originally Posted by richwang
    One of senior managers in CapitalLand has sold his own property and rents to stay. That's the equivalent for shorting the property market.
    Maybe he knows something we don't ... or he is taking action on something well known.

    Thanks,
    Richard

Similar Threads

  1. Redas calls for review of property tax policies
    By reporter2 in forum Finance and Legal
    Replies: 1
    -: 17-02-17, 18:02
  2. Time to review property cooling measures
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 11-07-15, 22:27
  3. Review property cooling measures: Foo Mee Har
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 8
    -: 04-06-14, 10:23
  4. CDL chief calls for review of property cooling measures
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 1
    -: 10-02-14, 16:06
  5. Why Singapore property tightening measures won't unwind for now
    By lifeline in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 2
    -: 10-01-14, 08:23

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •