Originally Posted by
hopeful
Hi, does anybody actually consider remaining lease in determining rental yield?
I was looking at some properties in commercialguru.
Some of the property leases are like 20 years left.
SO lets say, property is worth $1 million, the lease per year is $50,000 per year or $4167 per month.
If can get gross rental yield of 8%, so gross rental per year is $80,000 per year or $6667 per month.
If I dont take mortgage, my net is like $2500/mth or yield of 3% (before other expenses).
If I take mortgage, my yield would even be much lower than that 3%.
That set me to thinking about 99LH and FH/999yr properties.
For $1mil properties and 99yr LH,lease is like $10100/yr or $842/mth.
if can achieve gross rental like $3k/mth, my net is $2158/mth or 2.59% before considering all other expenses.
If FH/999yr properties (similar size/location to LH), assuming 20% premium, "lease" would be like $1.2mil/999 = $1201/yr or $100/mth.
if can achieve same rental $3k/mth, my net is $2900/mth or 2.90% before considering all other expenses.
So does FH/999yr actually achieves higher yield than LH?
Does anybody actually consider lease life when determining which property for rental yield, investment, capital gains.
or does people only say say rental yield important, but does actual fact remains is capital gains more important.
I sure am confused.