is that a mistake? 4500 sqft (built-in) on 3406 sqft (land) ??
is that a mistake? 4500 sqft (built-in) on 3406 sqft (land) ??
Why not.... quite common.Originally Posted by roly8
That means land area is 3406 sq ft.
Built up to 2 levels or more, so > 3406 sq ft.
Perfectly ok... problem only when land area is larger than build up... this case still reasonable...
???Originally Posted by ysyap
tot bigger land usually lesser built up?
both way ok la....MM land cfm bigger built up and vice versa.....as long they got follow ura guideline on the setback etc....
like this ok?Originally Posted by ysyap
3109 sqft / 289 sqm (built-in) , 4880 sqft / 453 sqm (land)
Cases where built-up is way larger than land area usually applies to newer terraces or semi-Ds whereby the owner/developer decides to maximise his living space.Originally Posted by roly8
The converse is true for very old single storey semi-Ds or detached/ bungalows. Espcially for single storey bungalows on large plots of land, the built-up is usually much smaller than land size.
Of course there are always exceptions to the rule but there are still restrictions which you can check the guidelines in URA for the various housing types.
Yes you are right... was referring to inter terrace... but such big lands usually either semi d or bungalow so both ways also can...Originally Posted by devilplate
Ok ok...Originally Posted by roly8