so the risk u mentioned:
1. bleeding
2. wound infection
3. adverse reaction to anaesthesia drugs - heightened stroke and heart attack risk
4. devices being left in wound site accidentally
5. formation of ugly surgical scars
results is 2 more additional death per 100k.
from the article, mortality rate for normal delivery is 6 per 100k. for c-section is 8 per 100k. not a big difference.
also from the same article
"if 1 million women underwent C-section at 39 weeks instead of waiting for onset of labor and attempting vaginal delivery,
692 more babies would be saved, 517 cases of intracranial hemorrhage and 377 brachial plexus injuries would be prevented."
if convert to per 100k, 69 babies would be saved.
the mathematics like this
no of women died (6-8) = -2
no of babies saved 69
total live save 67.
I am still waiting for a "Liu Bei" to visit me 3x. Sigh...such is the life of an undiscovered "Zhuge Liang"