Intentions not very apparent leh! It is to tell UOB to sleep with their 50yr tenure... Lol!Originally Posted by fclim
Intentions not very apparent leh! It is to tell UOB to sleep with their 50yr tenure... Lol!Originally Posted by fclim
bro, how was this derive from? Pai Seh, I am a bit slow on this.Originally Posted by Super
Hello, need some advice.
I bought a unit at Kovan Regency for about $1.25 million last Sat for investment
LTV @ 60%, loan tenure 30 years. Have not sign S&P yet.
Seems like market foresee prices to soften.
Should I forfeit my 1.25% booking fee and buy later?
If I buy later, my LTV is still 60% but loan tenure 25 years (rental may not be able to cover mortgage installment but I am fine to top up using savings)
Would appreciate any advice! Thank you
If you guys can recall sometime back I posted this thread. Was glad that I decided to pay the 3% absd instead of waiting. This is the 2nd time I escape the ltv revision Liao. Last time was in early jan 2011. Must go temple later.
http://www.condosingapore.com/forums...ad.php?t=13696
The bar to own a pte condo is just raised. Congrats.Originally Posted by Ringo33
ECs should be enjoying a bit more interest now.
For investment you shoud take advantage of the 30years loan to gnerate some cash flow. Preferable take up a loan package where you could afford not to refinance. If you wait there is no guarantee that price will come down or no further cooling measures for investment property.Originally Posted by CP5211
Maybe that will push up rental too????Originally Posted by ikan bilis
Maybe a sudden surge buy for age grp 34-35??? Otherwise they will miss the boat to get higher loan quantum......Originally Posted by proper-t
In fact, this CM hit very hard on
1. those who want to equity term loans, as most of these people are older
2. those in their 40s+ and 50s+, and want to buy second property.
The latest round of the heat in market, quite a high number should be in their 40s, so hit.
But I am surprised that no CM for commercial and industrial
Last edited by Laguna; 06-10-12 at 07:47.
You are half-hearted.The fundamental question you need to ask yourself is whether you like the unit or not.Originally Posted by CP5211
If don't like, gone the $15,000+
If like, then just keep it...and don't think further
Who know the unknown?
Maybe long queue at property launched this weekend fuel by buyer 35 year old in coming birthday....Originally Posted by UltimateAro888
making revenue from rental then limit to super rich.. rich get richer..Originally Posted by UltimateAro888
Lesser people can afforf to buy and rent..hence less available unit for rent... drive rental up..
If a person is more than 40 years old, will the bank allow more than 30 years loan period? I thought it will hit those in their 30s most.Originally Posted by Laguna
Am I the only one that think that impact would be muted over the longer term?
Most sensible people would not stretch loan to more than 65 years anyway
It's more physiological and weeding out those risk takers that couldn't afford in the first place with unreasonable risk tenure
That's how I read the MAS doc. It said greater than 30 years then 60% for 1st property and 40% for second. I assume less than 30 years then should be the same as today aka 80% for 1st property and 60% for second. I might be wrong.Originally Posted by 4wheels
Morale of story: never wait Otherwise miss the boat again and again.. last ship sampan also must sail.... never know whether the port will be there the next day for u to board..Originally Posted by Ringo33
Yes, there are couple of banks, the loan can go up to 75 years old.Originally Posted by hyenergix
Tv news said that average loan tenure is 29 years. Am surprised, that's rather high isn't it.Originally Posted by hovivi
Since this new rule is pegged to the retirement age, now govt cannot suka suka raise retirement age...Originally Posted by fclim
The banks must have done their due diligence to agree lending out to these buyers. I believe these buyers are mostly long-term investors with their 2nd/3rd properties. MAS may be hitting the wrong group and inevitably prevent upgraders in their 30s from owning a pte condo.Originally Posted by Laguna
The right group to hit should be the commercial and industry properties investors as they are the ones responsible for raising rentals and inflation. This is a very poor move by the government.
bro outstanding you think like a world class opposition party leader...Originally Posted by Kanarazu
Eco/KR Not affected if buyers signthe OTP beofre 6 oct 2012. Properties launch this weekend onwards will be badly affected Rich will be richer.Originally Posted by phantom_opera
Since you ask... Here it is:Originally Posted by carbuncle
"The return of the 借貸"
Originally Posted by UltimateAro888
morale of the story is, think long term, stick to your investment plan, and build your network of bankers and property agents to feed you information.
Yes, I FULLY agreed with you on this. Economy as a whole, shall bring down the cost of business and thus inflation.Originally Posted by hyenergix
I think, lots of 30s and 40s are going to be very unhappy, it is very difficult for them to save the additional 20%.
There is no certainty that prices will be softened, but one thing certained is that your loan tenure would be reduced by 5 yrs.Originally Posted by CP5211
After this new cm, unlikely there will be many more new launches sprouting up in the near future. If u give up yr KR now, do u foresee any other projects/sites which u might be keen?
with this new policy, it will be very difficult to generate passive income from property liao.Originally Posted by Laguna
I think this will come eventually. It's very frothy at the moment.Originally Posted by Laguna
i great "MAN" once said...."contentment is priceless"...Originally Posted by Laguna
why if i am a multi millionare with hordes of cash like my ex-landlord why not....heard he owns a few properties fully paid....shake leg collect tens of thousands rental every month....Originally Posted by Ringo33