ESTATE agencies and their agents are now regulated by a well-defined code of practice, conduct and ethics.
Property developers, on the other hand, do not seem to be governed so, as my experience recently revealed.
Through an external agent, I viewed an existing property put up for sale by Far East Organization.
Prior to and during the viewing, the agent and the developer's salesman said that the selling price of the property was $2.26 million.Reach your goals with Manulife
That same afternoon, the agent informed me that the developer would increase the price to $2.7 million with immediate effect.
However, as the salesman had communicated the price of $2.26 million prior to the intended increase, I was told that I would only have to pay for the lower price as long as I submitted the option to purchase and cheque by the end of that day.
Subsequent to asking for and receiving a re-affirmation from the developer on its offer and agreement on the $2.26 million price, I confirmed my intention to buy the property through the agent via an SMS text.
At 8pm that night, all parties met at the developer's satellite office, where the developer's senior manager was present for the paperwork.
But, before the option was signed, the senior manager received a telephone call, after which he informed us that his boss had decided against accepting my option to purchase.
I am writing to suggest that, apart from regulating and scrutinising estate agencies, the conduct and practices of developers should receive equal treatment, or be subject to an even more stringent oversight.
Danie Lim