or is it a must?
or is it a must?
depends on development
for new development up to the managing committee? Btw, the mthly maint fee also include sinking fund?
How to enforce? By not allowing that particular unit to have the car label?
树大必有枯枝,人多必有白痴。
树无皮必死无疑,人不要脸天下无敌!
Some management allow you to sell to those 2nd car owner.. !
"Anyone who has not made a mistake has never tried anything new"
bro, what project allow this? didn't know possible...
Originally Posted by CondoWE
if you dont't own any property, you're short. take cover quickly
Typically no lah. But allowing you to sell your entitlement to other owner is probably the best an MC can do.
If not, people may start to ask can opt out gym, swimming pool, tennis court
some new development may consider this as their units > carpark lots..
makes sense only if always not enough lotsOriginally Posted by bsslang
Typically no but heard from my friend who stay at THE CENTRIS @ Jurong point 2. said he sold it to the Shop owner there because he don't have any car....Originally Posted by auroraborealis
"Anyone who has not made a mistake has never tried anything new"
I guess the underlying intention for TS is to lower his monthly liabilities if he is investing into a MM unit. For investment grade, it is always better to optout carpark so you pay lesser fees. I do know several developments which can opt out like Alexis, Sail, Icon. For MM, I dont think can even sell to owners with 2nd car since MM tenants mostly dun drive. To sell to 3rd party your slot, I guess only CBD or places with season parking crunch has higher chance since there is a high demand for season parking [non-hourly rates] and if you offer a competitive price below market price
It's not exactly opt out right? It's more paying for parking is optional coz parking is open to public thus funded. Every mth still have to pay 300-400 for standard maintance. So no diff.
It is opt out for icon n alexis both 1rm/loft: ~170 n 80 respective lyOriginally Posted by minority
Juz wondering... for these MM devt, are the swimming pools MM too?
When you have eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth
I wonder why would MC wants to collect less maintenance fee for the estate? Are those developing having less carpark lots than the number of units?Originally Posted by dtrax
definitely not for Alexis which boasts the longest sky pool in a residence in sgOriginally Posted by sherlock