Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 32

Thread: Which District Would You Bet on?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,067

    Default Which District Would You Bet on?

    The districts are made unknown. based on the run up, which one would you place your bet on?


    District A:



    District B:




    District C:



    District D:


    District E:


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    335

    Default

    B looks very attractive.

    I wouldn't touch C, D or E with a ten foot pole!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    5,837

    Default

    my humble guess :

    A = D10
    B = D 9
    C = D 5
    D = D 3 / 16
    E = D ??? not sure

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,067

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by proud owner
    my humble guess :

    A = D10
    B = D 9
    C = D 5
    D = D 3 / 16
    E = D ??? not sure
    Haha...lets not guess first, but from technical analysis which one u will bet?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,141

    Default

    C,D,E. Growth region

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    8,926

    Default

    From TA, I will choose D
    Ride at your own risk !!!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    4,063

    Default

    For own stay : District E - cos it is value for money.

    For investment : District C and D - cos it is probably up and coming new estates.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    460

    Default

    A would be the CBD and B would be the CCR 9,10 11.

    C would be fringe and D/E the OCR
    When you have eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    9,217

    Default

    Deleted.......

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    B!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    460

    Default

    I go for Boon...
    When you have eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    2,438

    Default

    Hard to tell. Got rental yield data will be even better.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    928

    Default

    C.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    76

    Default

    I will go for any freehold property near king albert park station. This will be the interchange for the future cross island line as well

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    219

    Default

    A = D1
    B = D 9
    C = D 15
    D = D 19
    E = OCR

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    2,368

    Default

    District B looks like a "has been". District E looks up and coming with strong upward trend. District C shows signs of weakness.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,035

    Default

    Any district in SG that offers the lowest quantum plus decent rental yield, I take!

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    335

    Default

    For long term investment, definitely B & A have highest potential at this point in time. Remember, we are talking same commodities in different regions & they will revert to their own long term mean.


    Quote Originally Posted by leesg123
    The districts are made unknown. based on the run up, which one would you place your bet on?


    District A:



    District B:




    District C:



    District D:


    District E:


  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    787

    Default

    B has most potential upside. followed by A (need to select project).
    higher chance of foreign investment and higher rental yield.
    unfortunately quantum also higher.

    A = 2200psf, vol 50
    B = 1600psf, vol 50-100, got previous high vol & 2700 peak potential
    C = 1200psf, vol 100-200, volatile (mixed bag), plateauing soon?
    D = 1200psf, vol 200, less volatile, plateauing soon?
    E = 850psf, vol 200+

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,788

    Default

    A, B low volume....not so good...

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    787

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lovelle
    A, B low volume....not so good...

    perhaps it is not so much of volume as whether that unit has any taker.
    also volume is lower cos upside thus far has been ocr > ccr.

    A - potential upside when city living is fully / further transformed in district 1 and 2
    B - potential upside when Thomson line and NSE completed in 10 years in district 11

    of course best to hedge if have both ccr and ocr in portfolio.
    but after cm7 best to listen to our govt and let the first-timers and those with no property have their go.


    anyway after cm7, these graphs will change dramatically.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    6,003

    Default

    This is old thinking already. Bet on MRT! Wait till COE, ERP, parking charges, road taxes and oil price go up then everyone will scramble for MRT.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    787

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hyenergix
    This is old thinking already. Bet on MRT! Wait till COE, ERP, parking charges, road taxes and oil price go up then everyone will scramble for MRT.
    you are absolutely correct! bet on mrt less chance of going wrong.
    choose between ccr mrt or ocr mrt depending on affordability.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,035

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by heehee
    For long term investment, definitely B & A have highest potential at this point in time. Remember, we are talking same commodities in different regions & they will revert to their own long term mean.
    Possibly, it could be a permanent shift in trends due to various reasons.

    The whole Singapore trend is like C, D, E. Are we overgrowing?

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    6,003

    Default

    With e new MRT lines, decentralization will take place much faster.

    Prob w MRT concept is most of them lack integrated mall with shops, banks, clinics n offices. Hope this can b realised with e new MRT. Every station will then become a CCR.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    335

    Default

    Anyone who chooses C, D and E is ignoring the fact that property is an illiquid asset, VERY illiquid I may add, hence following a steep upward trend would be a very risky proposition considering that such trends have a tendency to reverse alarmingly and similarly follow a steep downward projection.

    A district that seems to be a "has been", as someone so succinctly put, represents hidden and forgotten potential. Whatever attributes it had that had put it way up there in the first place could still be inherent in it, as this is Singapore, and if you know well and believe deeply in Singapore, nothing with potential stays neglected for long.

    It is only a matter of time before this district rises again to surpass all pretenders to the throne. All it needs is economic conditions to be sweet and the government to give it a little push.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hyenergix
    This is old thinking already. Bet on MRT! Wait till COE, ERP, parking charges, road taxes and oil price go up then everyone will scramble for MRT.
    Good.. If everyone scrambles for MRT, then COE price will drop and I can afford a car.....Traffic will be a breeze and car park, ERP prices will all drop...
    Last edited by fclim; 18-01-13 at 00:11.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    335

    Default

    MRTs has little effects on prime districts. Otherwise it is like saying build MRT outside the luxury condos & bungalows & these owners will take MRT?

    Quote Originally Posted by hyenergix
    This is old thinking already. Bet on MRT! Wait till COE, ERP, parking charges, road taxes and oil price go up then everyone will scramble for MRT.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by heehee
    MRTs has little effects on prime districts. Otherwise it is like saying build MRT outside the luxury condos & bungalows & these owners will take MRT?
    maybe cos the rich goes green..

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    2,438

    Default

    Yeah, they go green by downgrading from a BMW 740 to a 535. Or they buy a hybrid Mercedes instead. That is their definition of going green.



    Quote Originally Posted by newbie11
    maybe cos the rich goes green..

Similar Threads

  1. District 15 versus District 16
    By creative_vitamin in forum East Coast
    Replies: 29
    -: 30-09-18, 17:29
  2. D9 and D11, which district is better?
    By DCC in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 127
    -: 29-08-17, 09:51
  3. Windfall in District 15
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 1
    -: 28-06-16, 13:12
  4. Buyer activity returns to District 15 and Scotts Square in District 9
    By Kevin Tan in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 04-11-15, 15:27
  5. District Watch: District 23
    By princess_morbucks in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 6
    -: 06-04-14, 10:48

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •