Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 31

Thread: Why government is not stopping FEO from monopolize land lease?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,511

    Default Why government is not stopping FEO from monopolize land lease?

    Hi all...I am aiming for Mt Sinai Henry Park new development.

    However, it seems it is on a 103/99 year lease which is monopolize by FEO. I will write an email to Mr. Khaw of MND and URA to address my concern.

    Anyone can provide any insight and view(s) on this matter? Thanks.

  2. #2
    ikan bilis's Avatar
    ikan bilis is offline i'm Buaya ! Girls BEWARE !!...
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,385

    Default

    umm.... try don;t use pseudonym/pen-name of yowetan when you write to cow...
    property is for you to ...
    ... hold tight tight, keep long long...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,511

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ikan bilis
    umm.... try don;t use pseudonym/pen-name of yowetan when you write to cow...
    Hi..I have wrote to him before, and I will want to keep the consistency.

    Whistleblowing is an art.

  4. #4
    ikan bilis's Avatar
    ikan bilis is offline i'm Buaya ! Girls BEWARE !!...
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,385

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yowetan
    Hi..I have wrote to him before, and I will want to keep the consistency.

    Whistleblowing is an art.
    cow got reply you the last time ??...
    property is for you to ...
    ... hold tight tight, keep long long...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,511

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ikan bilis
    cow got reply you the last time ??...
    That's a secret.

  6. #6
    ikan bilis's Avatar
    ikan bilis is offline i'm Buaya ! Girls BEWARE !!...
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,385

    Default

    hmm... guess cow won't bother to reply you this time, bcoz very soon he will have to launch LH45 for all GLS... if market fever don't get cool down...

    ... LH99 from FEO better than LH45 mah ??..
    property is for you to ...
    ... hold tight tight, keep long long...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,511

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ikan bilis
    hmm... guess cow won't bother to reply you this time, bcoz very soon he will have to launch LH45 for all GLS... if market fever don't get cool down...

    ... LH99 from FEO better than LH45 mah ??..
    I will be disappointed if the government allows developer monopolise the landlease and park it as their land bank.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    3,943

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yowetan
    I will be disappointed if the government allows developer monopolise the landlease and park it as their land bank.
    then, u will keep disappoint for life....
    this is far beyond MND to address

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    4,063

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yowetan
    I will be disappointed if the government allows developer monopolise the landlease and park it as their land bank.
    But the land belongs to feo.... so they can do anything they like.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    132

    Default

    Just ask government to tax freehold 10 times that of leasehold.. 999 years vs 99 year

    FEO will vomit out everything FOC..

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,511

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Laguna
    then, u will keep disappoint for life....
    this is far beyond MND to address
    Hi...your son's and many other son/daughter future will be in dire state when the land lease is controlled by the developer instead government URA etc.

    There is no free market when all developer buy up all freehold and 999LH.

    The disappointment will be massive.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,036

    Default

    for this i support ah tan. if developer buy up all FH and sell leasehold. they will be controlling state land forever

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    8

    Default

    There is Land Acquisition Act....

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ay123
    for this i support ah tan. if developer buy up all FH and sell leasehold. they will be controlling state land forever
    willing seller, willing buyer. if you don't like the deal, don't buy from the developer.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wtpooh
    There is Land Acquisition Act....
    there are conditions attached to it. this isn't russia or china, where the socialist government can take over land for common use without restitution

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by buttercarp
    But the land belongs to feo.... so they can do anything they like.
    unless govt decide to built mrt station on the land...
    In the final analysis.....its NOT whether you have a diploma,degree,masters OR PHD....its whether you have a HDB/PC/EC or LANDED...

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eng81157
    there are conditions attached to it. this isn't russia or china, where the socialist government can take over land for common use without restitution
    Yes, China is different - if the owners refuse to move they have to build the highway around it!

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...use-China.html

    No such nonsense in Singapore.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wtpooh
    Yes, China is different - if the owners refuse to move they have to build the highway around it!

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...use-China.html

    No such nonsense in Singapore.
    heard that the owner had agreed the settlement and moved

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yowetan
    I will be disappointed if the government allows developer monopolise the landlease and park it as their land bank.

    u have a choice. let ur finger do the walking dont buy!

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,141

    Default

    If you think developer has so much an edge, then work towards becoming a developer! Then you can buy many free hold land and resell as leasehold.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    218

    Default

    You have a choice.. Surrender ur pink ic

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    312

    Default

    Government may not heed your call, as it is FEO's rights to package the product in his way and willing buyers will bite. The easier way to start is perhaps to request developers to explain clearly it is leasehold on freehold on the brochure and in the show room, and implications have to be explained, for example, buyers cannot enbloc to other developers , and all these cannot be hidden in the tiny footnotes, they must be made obvious.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,318

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackapple
    Just ask government to tax freehold 10 times that of leasehold.. 999 years vs 99 year

    FEO will vomit out everything FOC..

    Excellent idea, people or companies that own FH or 999yrs land and sold it to consumers as LH units should be tax very heavily each year on their land.

    Many people were unware that the land on which their LH units were bought belonged to the developer or a private entity, not the Govt. They should have been fully informed of this by the developers before the sale, but the developers just kept quiet. The law should be corrected to protect consumers and tax very heavily on these private land owners.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    14

    Default

    Unless the owner of the "freehold" land is the sultan of Johore or some English royalties, i hardly believe there are any true "freehold" land in singapore. For as long the ruling party remains.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    218

    Default

    Be very careful about choosing to 'kick out the ruling party'..

    Hope you can find some time to see how the cultural revolution happened in china.. As well as the implications and how it set back the country a good number of years.

    The sentiment of young people nowadays is just whine and whine and whine.. You want succes you have to work for it!! And very hard at that!

    You want freehold land, jolly well Work hard tk get One. Don't always demand for the government to do things for you, unless of course you want to exist in a communist society.. Do work or don't do work, you will still get your 'basic rights'.

    Cheers

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,309

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by economist
    Government may not heed your call, as it is FEO's rights to package the product in his way and willing buyers will bite. The easier way to start is perhaps to request developers to explain clearly it is leasehold on freehold on the brochure and in the show room, and implications have to be explained, for example, buyers cannot enbloc to other developers , and all these cannot be hidden in the tiny footnotes, they must be made obvious.
    There is a HUGE misunderstanding about the strategic intent of the 103 years LH on FH land. Developer's aim is not to compete for enbloc, but to make use of the owners of the 103LH to help them enbloc.

    See if from their view, they sell u 103 years, 25 years later, you go back to them to pay them the same amount as you will pay the government to top up the lease, they happily accept knowing that thats the max the mkt willing to pay.

    Get the money, top up the lease, then repeat again 25 yrs later!

    Seriously, who want to wait for 103 years ?

    Think, my friends, Think!
    DKSG

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,997

    Default

    DKSG... why are you asking @economist to think when you should be the one doing some thinking

    Quote Originally Posted by DKSG
    There is a HUGE misunderstanding about the strategic intent of the 103 years LH on FH land. Developer's aim is not to compete for enbloc, but to make use of the owners of the 103LH to help them enbloc.

    See if from their view, they sell u 103 years, 25 years later, you go back to them to pay them the same amount as you will pay the government to top up the lease, they happily accept knowing that thats the max the mkt willing to pay.

    Get the money, top up the lease, then repeat again 25 yrs later!

    Seriously, who want to wait for 103 years ?

    Think, my friends, Think!
    DKSG

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,309

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by howgozit
    DKSG... why are you asking @economist to think when you should be the one doing some thinking
    Oops ... the thinking part is meant for all of us to think about it.

    I did some extensive thinking and talking to developers when the 103 yr thing came out, so sharing with you all now...

    DKSG

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,997

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by naan1974
    Unless the owner of the "freehold" land is the sultan of Johore or some English royalties, i hardly believe there are any true "freehold" land in singapore. For as long the ruling party remains.
    What does freehold land have anything to do with the ruling party?

    You mean if there is another party ruling Singapore there will be "true" freehold land?

    You see... you could have made some sense with your first few lines... then you had to add a political statement at the end....

    And suddenly you don't sound like a very sensible person.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,997

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DKSG
    Oops ... the thinking part is meant for all of us to think about it.

    I did some extensive thinking and talking to developers when the 103 yr thing came out, so sharing with you all now...

    DKSG
    My apologies if I sounded mean...

    But I don't see your point. Maybe I am not thinking enough. And I think quite a lot...

    Good night.

Similar Threads

  1. Unveiled: first government land sales under new BCA rules
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 07-11-14, 16:53
  2. H2 2013 Government Land Sales (GLS)
    By Ringo33 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 33
    -: 25-06-13, 13:04
  3. Government land sales (GLS) 1H2013
    By Pro888 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 65
    -: 20-12-12, 08:12
  4. Government Land Sales (GLS) Programme
    By Poloclub in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 14
    -: 13-06-12, 21:11
  5. Government Land Sales
    By hyenergix in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 15
    -: 24-12-11, 18:35

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •