Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 79

Thread: Tender closing for residential site at Tampines Avenue 10 (Parcel B)

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,660

    Default Tender closing for residential site at Tampines Avenue 10 (Parcel B)

    LAND PARCEL AT TAMPINES AVENUE 10 (PARCEL B)
    ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT : RESIDENTIAL
    SITE AREA : 17,102.9 m²
    MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE GFA : 47,889 m²
    DATE OF LAUNCH : 15 MAY 2013
    DATE TENDER CLOSED : 16 JULY 2013
    LEASE PERIOD : 99 YEARS
    RANKING NAME OF TENDERER
    TENDERED
    SALE
    PRICE ($)
    TENDERED
    SALE PRICE
    IN
    $PSM OF
    GFA
    1 MCC Land (Singapore) Pte Ltd $289,700,000.00 $6,049.41
    2 UOL Venture Investments Pte. Ltd. and Kheng
    Leong Company (Private) Limited $269,200,000.00 $5,621.33
    3 Kingsford Development Pte Ltd $258,258,000.00 $5,392.85
    4 EL Development Pte Ltd $230,100,000.00 $4,804.86
    5 FCL Place Pte. Ltd. $225,880,000.00 $4,716.74
    6 Keng Hoe Development Pte. Ltd. $203,800,000.00 $4,255.67
    7 CEL EC Development Pte Ltd $201,000,000.00 $4,197.21
    8 BBR Property Pte. Ltd. $192,113,300.00 $4,011.64
    9 Fragrance Homes Pte Ltd $184,550,000.00 $3,853.70
    10 Allgreen Properties Limited $183,060,000.00 $3,822.59

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    2,429

    Default Tampines Ave 10 site draws $289.7 million top bid in 10-way tussle

    http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking...ussle-20130716

    Published on Jul 16, 2013
    8:11 PM

    By Cheryl Ong

    A residential plot at Tampines Avenue 10 has beaten market expectations by attracting a top bid of about $289.7 million in a 10-way tussle amongst developers.

    Analysts said that they were "shocked" by the bullish bidding for the Tampines Avenue 10 (Parcel B) plot, despite new rules implemented by the Monetary Authority of Singapore last month to cap mortgage limits for borrowers already in debt.

    The top bid when the tender closed on Tuesday came from Chinese developer MCC Land, with an offer of $562 per sq ft (psf) per plot ratio (ppr).

    This was 7.6 per cent above the next highest bid submitted by a tie-up between UOL Venture Investments and Kheng Leong Company, at $522 psf ppr.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    "Never argue with an idiot, or he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    2,429

    Default

    Indeed very shocking at $562 per sq ft (psf) per plot ratio (ppr), and 10 bidders!
    Qbay was at $418 psf ppr in May 2012.
    So it just gets higher and higher!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,309

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by princess_morbucks
    Indeed very shocking at $562 per sq ft (psf) per plot ratio (ppr), and 10 bidders!
    Qbay was at $418 psf ppr in May 2012.
    So it just gets higher and higher!
    When Jurong sells for $1,700, anything goes !

    Developer will ask themselves, if they sell this site for $1,500, it is consider dirt cheap!

    Jurong for $1,700 or QBay II for $1,500 (no MRT, no this no that) - which would u choose ?

    DKSG

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,309

    Default

    No screams ?

    DKSG

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,788

    Default

    which other project is developed by mcc land ?
    nvr heard of them

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    177

    Default

    The site area is smaller than q bay and yet they bid at a higher price. What's so good about this site?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,141

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by princess_morbucks
    Indeed very shocking at $562 per sq ft (psf) per plot ratio (ppr), and 10 bidders!
    Qbay was at $418 psf ppr in May 2012.
    So it just gets higher and higher!
    WOW this is crazy, higher price than even D5 Jalan Lempeng Clementi site!!!
    Just like the forumers say, if FAR EAST Tampines can bid so high, Jurong East should reach $2000PSF soon! River Valley $2500psf, Orchard $5000psf!!!!

    Huat ah!!!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DKSG
    When Jurong sells for $1,700, anything goes !

    Developer will ask themselves, if they sell this site for $1,500, it is consider dirt cheap!

    Jurong for $1,700 or QBay II for $1,500 (no MRT, no this no that) - which would u choose ?

    DKSG
    I don't get it. Near mrt better right?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,342

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lovelle
    which other project is developed by mcc land ?
    nvr heard of them
    Coming in fast & furious. Aggressive. Mainly in the north part.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    2,429

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lovelle
    which other project is developed by mcc land ?
    nvr heard of them
    The Canopy EC
    One Canberra EC
    Canberra Residences

    LOL...seems like they like the letter "C" with the word "can".
    So mabbe this new project will start with C as well?

    Perhaps this new project may be called "The Candescence" or "The Candelilla" ?
    Last edited by princess_morbucks; 16-07-13 at 21:29.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    8,926

    Default

    562psf, about 150psf more than QBay

    selling price will be around 1100psf, same as Qbay
    Ride at your own risk !!!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    290

    Default

    What's Q'bay's land price?
    Anybody has ready access to this data?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    2,429

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Khng8
    What's Q'bay's land price?
    Anybody has ready access to this data?
    $418 psf ppr.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,342

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phantom_opera
    562psf, about 150psf more than QBay

    selling price will be around 1100psf, same as Qbay
    MCC land link to Mr. Hu Jintao.

    They can better manage cost, collaboration with China Jingye as the main-con.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    290

    Default

    Thanks Princess!
    Wow. Really surprise that this plot sell higher than Q'bay when it's located further away from the reservoir & no view to speak of?
    Cooling measure also not working lei ...

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    672

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by princess_morbucks
    Quote Originally Posted by Lovelle
    which other project is developed by mcc land ?
    nvr heard of them
    The Canopy EC
    One Canberra EC
    Canberra Residences

    LOL...seems like they like the letter "C" with the word "can".
    So mabbe this new project will start with C as well?

    Perhaps this new project may be called "The Candescence" or "The Candelilla" ?
    The Nautical does not start with 'C'

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    60

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phantom_opera
    562psf, about 150psf more than QBay

    selling price will be around 1100psf, same as Qbay
    At least 1250psf..we shall see...

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,612

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phantom_opera
    562psf, about 150psf more than QBay

    selling price will be around 1100psf, same as Qbay
    Omg, really no <$1000psf le...

  21. #21

    Default Tampines Ave 10 GLS - A whopping 34.5% increase in psf over a period of 1 year!


  22. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,660

    Default

    jin scary.. my guess will be av 1150 psf

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,620

    Default

    MCC land is flushed with cash now. Of course this China developer is bullish. No fear. MAS says Singapore is stable.
    Yee ha! Did I tickle your funny bone?


  24. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,620

    Default

    They don't know that plot of land across the road is meant for industry. Similar to the ones further down the road. These industrial factories can be as tall as 13 storeys HDB flat height.

    Yee ha! Did I tickle your funny bone?


  25. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,612

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ecimbew
    They don't know that plot of land across the road is meant for industry. Similar to the ones further down the road. These industrial factories can be as tall as 13 storeys HDB flat height.

    Developers dunno?

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,620

    Default

    There... industrial land

    Yee ha! Did I tickle your funny bone?


  27. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    177

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ecimbew
    They don't know that plot of land across the road is meant for industry. Similar to the ones further down the road. These industrial factories can be as tall as 13 storeys HDB flat height.

    Is this reflected in the Masterplan that the industrial area will be so tall?

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,620

    Default

    More land to be sold around the vicinity in future.
    So no fear for those who do not like this plot.
    A new road will be introduced behind Qbay and this parcel B.



    Place of worship next to parcel B.
    Yee ha! Did I tickle your funny bone?


  29. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickq
    Is this reflected in the Masterplan that the industrial area will be so tall?
    Plot ratio is 2.5 for the industrial land.
    Plot ratio is 2.8 for residential land.
    Yee ha! Did I tickle your funny bone?


  30. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,620

    Default

    Good news though. Parcel B will be able to see the quarry!
    But it's west sun.

    Yee ha! Did I tickle your funny bone?


Similar Threads

  1. URA launches tender for Clementi Avenue 1 residential site
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 01-03-19, 16:57
  2. New Tampines Avenue 10 condo Parcel C
    By sgproplaucnh in forum East
    Replies: 3
    -: 10-02-18, 10:55
  3. Tender closing for residential site at Yishun Avenue 9
    By dtrax in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 6
    -: 13-03-14, 11:09
  4. Tender closing for residential site at Buangkok Drive / Sengkang Central
    By dtrax in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 10
    -: 12-06-12, 21:38
  5. Replies: 5
    -: 07-05-10, 00:15

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •