Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: New row over Gilstead collective sale

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    10,829

    Default New row over Gilstead collective sale

    http://www.straitstimes.com/premium/...-sale-20131010

    New row over Gilstead collective sale

    Published on Oct 10, 2013

    By Cheryl Ong


    THE fractious collective sale of Gilstead Court has hit more trouble with a breakaway group from the sales committee asking the High Court to remove financial penalties aimed at minority owners.

    Four members of the seven-man committee, including treasurer Choo Liang Haw, filed documents with the court on Monday, escalating what has already been one of the most fractious collective sales in years.

    The dispute centres on penalty clauses the collective sale agreement had imposed on the five dissenting owners at the estate in Newton.

    These clauses could cost the five owners up to $26,000 each, a prospect that led them to file an objection with the Strata Titles Board (STB).

    This triggered mandatory mediation but that failed last month after the sales committee could not agree to remove the clauses from the sales agreement.

    That prompted the board to place a stop order on the deal.

    The sales committee now has to apply to the High Court to have the collective sale approved. The Straits Times understands that it has until Monday next week to do so.

    The division among the committee that arose during the mediation process appears to have led to Monday's court application.

    The clauses state that the 43 owners who consented to the collective sale should contribute $2,000 out of their own pocket to a common fund for procedures related to the sale effort.

    This sum would be refunded with 12 per cent interest once the sale has been completed.

    But the minority owners would have $4,000 deducted from their share of the sale proceeds and shared equally among the 43 consenting sellers.

    Other clauses state that the minority owners will have to stump up costs related to the STB approval proceedings.

    Typically, costs related to legal proceedings of a collective sale are borne by all owners.

    An application to the STB is not needed if all owners consent to the transaction.

    The 163-page document filed by the four committee members said that the minority owners had offered to sign the agreement in June as long as the penalising clauses were removed. This would have eliminated the need for an application to the board.

    But their proposal was turned down by the committee secretary, former Supreme Court judge Warren Khoo, according to the court document.

    Mr Khoo, who had drafted the sales agreement, told the minority owners by e-mail that the clauses were aimed at promoting the principle of equality in the sharing of benefits.

    The court documents also stated that minority owners would have to fork out about $26,000 each, which would be distributed to the 43 sellers.

    The four committee members want the court to remove the "offensive clauses" in their words, if the objecting owners sign the sales agreement.

    Tuan Sing Holdings, the developer that successfully tendered for the site in June, has offered to pay up to $135,000 for legal fees and other related costs. The committee has yet to accept the offer.

    Majority owners have also said that they are prepared to forgo any payments that could be claimed from minority owners.

    When The Straits Times contacted a committee member who was not part of the High Court application, he declined to comment as he had not received a copy of the court documents.

    [email protected]

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    87

    Smile

    Hmm... since now the minority willing to sign the collective sales agreement IF those penalties against them are removed, it is a healthy and good step towards the final enbloc sales.

    I guess those who insist on keeping the original penalties are doing so out of a sense of principle than profits. If those minority had not stand against the sale in the first instance, everyone would be treated "fairly" with the expenses and refunds after the sale.

    Hopefully, they can reach an amicable agreement.... it may be tough to continue living together as a community if there are already cracks or bad blood.... daggers and finger pointing will not promote peace.

    Everyone take a step forward and look at the big picture.... may as well have a closure than dragging on like this, court in court out.

    Just some personal thoughts.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    all because of $$$...many year neighbour friends become enemy well done spore way to go
    In the final analysis.....its NOT whether you have a diploma,degree,masters OR PHD....its whether you have a HDB/PC/EC or LANDED...

Similar Threads

  1. Collective sale of Gilstead Court off after twists and turns
    By reporter2 in forum En Bloc Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 15-07-15, 23:16
  2. Two Gilstead Court owners file appeal over collective sale
    By reporter2 in forum En Bloc Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 01-04-15, 16:15
  3. Row over Gilstead Court sale rages on
    By reporter2 in forum En Bloc Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 24-09-13, 11:49
  4. Row may block Gilstead Court collective sale
    By reporter2 in forum En Bloc Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 05-08-13, 11:13
  5. Gilstead Court- DIY en bloc sale
    By victorcpwong in forum En Bloc Achieved
    Replies: 0
    -: 02-07-13, 15:33

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •