Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 34

Thread: An Example of Bad Property Advice by Propwise.sg

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    2,429

    Default An Example of Bad Property Advice by Propwise.sg

    https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/ex...135952605.html

    By Gerald Tay (guest contributor)

    I can’t help it. I read some bad advice recently and have to say something. I’ll try to keep it positive, but my tongue is already bleeding from biting it. In Singapore, inflation is on the rise, but this one thing is still offered for free – advice. It’s really funny to observe people taking it so lightly. But only the advice that makes you profit in reality (i.e. real profit not imaginary) is good, otherwise it’s useless or even disastrous.

    Most people don’t know the difference between advice from rich people and advice from sales people. Most get their financial advice from the latter — people who profit even if you lose. In this post, I explore why one recently written article by ‘experts’ (sales people in disguise) will prove disastrous for both average investors and home buyers. Your task is to look for any hidden agenda.

    An example of bad property advice

    The article, Why 2014 is going to be the best year in buying property, appeared in Yahoo Singapore News on 16th April, 2014.

    The article aims to sell readers three ‘benefits’ of buying a suburban condo today:

    1. Because You Can Afford a Better First Home Than You Realize

    BAD ADVICE: “The monthly salary needed to get the most out of your property purchase is $10,000 to $12,000. I know, it’s not the easiest number to reach. But if you and your spouse can climb your way to this number, you’ll be in a prime position to afford a fantastic first home.”

    BAD ADVICE: “According to ERA key spokesman Eugene Lim, depending on whether your income is fixed and your finances are well within the Total Debt Servicing Ration (TDSR) framework, you should be able to afford properties priced between $600,000 and $1.2 million.”

    REALITY CHECK: Having a combined income of $10,000 to $12,000 for married couples does not justify a worthwhile reason to own an expensive suburban condominium as their first home. The purchase is more conspicuous spending than financial prudence.

    Most married couples I know simply live from pay-check to pay-check servicing expensive home and car loans to keep up with society’s expectations. If one spouse loses his/her job, their financial position gets tougher with kids along the way.

    Suburban condos that are priced lower than $1 million today are very small units, either the 1-bedders or 2-bedders, spaces that may be too small for a married couple who wants to start a family. Today’s $1.2 million condos do not get you much space either, only larger mortgage payments. Even at a low 1.5% interest rate for a 30-year loan tenure on a 20% down-payment, a couple would have to fork out $3,300 every month. With interest rates at 3.5%, the mortgage payments jump to $4,300 every month.

    REALITY CHECK: Total Debt Servicing Ratio (TDSR) guidelines are meant to serve the business interests of a lending bank to a borrower. They are not meant to serve as financially prudent advice for buyers.

    Most couples with a combined income of $10,000 to $12,000 would do a lot better financially buying less expensive re-sale HDB flats instead. They could use that savings to acquire financial freedom instead of paying through their noses for a cage in the sky.

    2. Because Falling Prices Make the Additional Buyer’s Stamp Duty (ABSD) Less Scary



    BAD ADVICE: “What a 7% property drop would save you on ABSD – As you can see, falling property prices take the “bite” out of ABSD when it comes to purchasing a second or third property. You’ll even be able to save money, as the example above shows.”

    BAD ADVICE: “If property prices drop by 7% to 10% over the course of 2014, which everyone expects will happen – the pain of ABSD actually gets nullified.

    REALITY CHECK: I have received many emails from readers telling me they have gotten a great price on a property. One particular lady approached me excitedly about discounted developer prices for a project called Sky Habitat in Bishan recently.

    “How good is the price?” I asked

    “During launch, developer is selling units at $1,600 to $1,800 psf. And now they are selling only at $1,300 psf. What do you think? Is it a good buy?”

    “How would I know?” I replied. “All you have given me is the price.”

    “Yes!” she squealed. “Now my husband and I can afford it.”

    Only cheap people buy on price. Just because something is cheap or cheaper doesn’t mean it’s worth the cost.

    One of my most basic money principles: I buy value. I will pay more for value. If I don’t like the price, I simply pass. If the seller wants to sell, he will come back with a better price. I let him tell me what he will accept. I know some people love to haggle; personally, I don’t. If a person wants to sell, they will sell. If I feel what I am buying is of value, I’ll pay the price. Value rather than price has made me rich.

    Whether you pay ABSD or not constitutes a small part of what’s important in the scheme of things. Looking at the overall picture of what really constitutes a quality investment is a better gauge than simply looking at savings and price alone.

    REALITY CHECK: Banks do not lend money to borrowers because they’ve bought the property at discounted prices or cheaper than their neighbour.

    Banks lend solely based on the ability of the borrower to repay the loan. They don’t care if you bought the property with great savings by buying at discounted prices, cheaper or less expensive than your neighbour.

    The bank’s only concern is, “Is the borrower able to service his/her loan on time?”

    3. Because You’ll Be Able to Purchase Additional Properties with Little or No Financing

    BAD ADVICE: “But there’s another way to purchase property in this buyer’s market – buying property from new launches through the progressive payment scheme.”

    BAD ADVICE: “In most new launches, units priced below $1 million are usually purchased quickly. That’s because payment for new developments is made progressively, allowing buyers who aren’t severely affected by tighter loan rules to buy smaller units with cash instead of financing larger units.”

    REALITY CHECK: If a buyer decides to buy a smaller unit because he/she is severely affected by tighter loan rules, it simply shows he/she may already be overstretching on finances, never mind a smaller unit.

    This is the equivalent of saying, “If I cannot afford a Ferrari, I will throw my money modifying a cheap Toyota Vios to look and sound like one.”

    “If I cannot afford a second property in Singapore, I’ll just throw my money into a cheap overseas property I’ve never seen before.”

    Many ‘experts’ have given advice that suggests buying with no or little money down is more important than buying a quality investment property. In your overall investment analysis, how you finance the property isn’t as important as buying one that will be a sound, long-term investment, i.e. quality properties that have positive cash-flow. Even if it’s 100% financed, a bad property is a bad property!

    When you look at the noise out there, you will come across numerous suggestions on what you should do, and have to determine the legitimacy of every idea presented to you. It’s often not easy to differentiate between good advice and a bad advice, so take care before you act on it.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    322

    Default

    Hard truth. Too late to back out now for many.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,810

    Default

    I have received the following SMS from an agent.

    " Unbelievable but True. Own a freehold property Iskandar Condo with S$4k, pay nothing till TOP."

    Does any one dare to buy?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    2,429

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by irisng View Post
    I have received the following SMS from an agent.

    " Unbelievable but True. Own a freehold property Iskandar Condo with S$4k, pay nothing till TOP."

    Does any one dare to buy?
    Which Iskandar project is this?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,301

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by irisng View Post
    I have received the following SMS from an agent.

    " Unbelievable but True. Own a freehold property Iskandar Condo with S$4k, pay nothing till TOP."

    Does any one dare to buy?
    Better check if need the 1mil rm new rule. Think only medini exempted...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    2,429

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mummy View Post
    Better check if need the 1mil rm new rule. Think only medini exempted...
    Looks like not Medini as irisng said it is freehold.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    138

    Default

    Authors says he buys based on good value and is less concerned about price

    No definition of what constitutes good value was provided.

    Definition of value may be relative to different people

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,102

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Newbie1 View Post
    Authors says he buys based on good value and is less concerned about price

    No definition of what constitutes good value was provided.

    Definition of value may be relative to different people
    I am sure majority of us all know what's good value !
    Condos that are easily rentable, amenities nearby, mrt within 200m etc...
    @1500psf for a 2 bedder southbank or sky habitat, which 1 has better value? I m sure the answer is pretty obvious!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,812

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fiat500 View Post
    I am sure majority of us all know what's good value !
    Condos that are easily rentable, amenities nearby, mrt within 200m etc...
    @1500psf for a 2 bedder southbank or sky habitat, which 1 has better value? I m sure the answer is pretty obvious!
    So if 1,500psf southbank vs 1350psf sky habitat, which one better value????

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,301

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chestnut View Post
    So if 1,500psf southbank vs 1350psf sky habitat, which one better value????
    I just worried all overvalued...

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,102

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chestnut View Post
    So if 1,500psf southbank vs 1350psf sky habitat, which one better value????
    Imo, it's still southbank!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,812

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mummy View Post
    I just worried all overvalued...
    I think sky habitat fair value, that's why now can move...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,102

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mummy View Post
    I just worried all overvalued...
    If overvalue, what about those in jb now? They are selling @rm1500psf for new projects! Even more scary...

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,812

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fiat500 View Post
    Imo, it's still southbank!

    Ok

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    138

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chestnut View Post
    I think sky habitat fair value, that's why now can move...
    For own stay, if parents live across the street or workplace a short distance away, the perceived "value" to the individual's needs will be different.

    "value" is also not static, it changes with time and circumstances

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    8,926

    Default

    Singaporeans only read ST ... seldom read the real stuff

    Ride at your own risk !!!

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,739

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phantom_opera View Post
    Singaporeans only read ST ... seldom read the real stuff

    you didnt know people call it progress?

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,301

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fiat500 View Post
    If overvalue, what about those in jb now? They are selling @rm1500psf for new projects! Even more scary...
    Agree JB condos are overvalue too. My semid there only rm357 psf compared to 1500psf rm for condos...dun really understand why....maybe land plentiful there?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,739

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mummy View Post
    Agree JB condos are overvalue too. My semid there only rm357 psf compared to 1500psf rm for condos...dun really understand why....maybe land plentiful there?
    your land cost is much cheaper than construction cost i supposed and also your semi-d dont have the luxury of multi-storey carpark, hence ur semi-d is cheaper

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,301

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hopeful View Post
    your land cost is much cheaper than construction cost i supposed and also your semi-d dont have the luxury of multi-storey carpark, hence ur semi-d is cheaper
    But housing market is rising fast in Johor due to the Sg effect partly...the smart ones went in 2009 and taken profit already...

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,812

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phantom_opera View Post
    Singaporeans only read ST ... seldom read the real stuff

    It is like this everywhere....

    It is the 80/20 rule...

    20% will read and expand knowledge, 80% will not
    20% will save, 80% will spend
    20% will know how to invest, 80% will not
    20% are management, 80% are not.
    20% are officers, 80% are not

    If 80% are leaders and 20% are workers, we will have a big problem....

    Can you imagine in a dragon boat race, 18 people leading and 2 rolling the boat????

    Guess how many % of US citizens have not travelled out of the US????
    Hahahahahaha


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle
    Last edited by chestnut; 13-05-14 at 17:46.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,739

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phantom_opera View Post
    Singaporeans only read ST ... seldom read the real stuff

    from what i read:
    the middle class of the US in the 1950s-1970s is an aberration.

    after WW2, the industrial bases in europe, asia is destroyed whereas in the us, it remain intact.
    this allows the us to export to other countries.

    when europe, asia rebuilt their industrial base, that's when problem comes for the us and due to out-sourcing, manufacturing is hollowed out.

    from what i read again:
    this is one reason why us want to interfere in ukraine etc.
    russia & western europe sanction each other, both economy kaput.
    and even if they go to conventional war. as long as conventional war is limited to eurasia land mass, then us will profit from the conflict.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,810

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by princess_morbucks View Post
    Which Iskandar project is this?
    The agent didn't mention. I have no idea who is this agent. He just asked me to sms him for e-brochure.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,810

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fiat500 View Post
    I am sure majority of us all know what's good value !
    Condos that are easily rentable, amenities nearby, mrt within 200m etc...
    @1500psf for a 2 bedder southbank or sky habitat, which 1 has better value? I m sure the answer is pretty obvious!
    Agree. Good value is one thing and whether can afford is another thing. Average investors/home owners hoping to stay in a condo will have limited fund in buying prime areas, so they must start somewhere first eg mm unit or suburban area

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,301

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by irisng View Post
    The agent didn't mention. I have no idea who is this agent. He just asked me to sms him for e-brochure.
    Better be careful of property agents talk at this time....got money, want rental income or passive income, buy good blue chip stocks at the right time with good divended....do not be over exposed to property alone as yr investment esp if already old and cannot make up losses...

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,812

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mummy View Post
    Better be careful of property agents talk at this time....got money, want rental income or passive income, buy good blue chip stocks at the right time with good divended....do not be over exposed to property alone as yr investment esp if already old and cannot make up losses...
    Look at the history of bluechip stocks 2008/9 and compare to today.... not all blue chips recovered to its heyday.... in life bo pao one....

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,301

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chestnut View Post
    Look at the history of bluechip stocks 2008/9 and compare to today.... not all blue chips recovered to its heyday.... in life bo pao one....
    True but when I read salary.sg so many people seem to be getting high dividend passive income...wonder how much they put in to get 40k in dividend income...guess they must have bought bank shares eons ago when cheap...

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,102

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mummy View Post
    True but when I read salary.sg so many people seem to be getting high dividend passive income...wonder how much they put in to get 40k in dividend income...guess they must have bought bank shares eons ago when cheap...
    Not true,they could hv bought it @ sky high prices years ago during the bull run n got stuck with the stocks till now..Can't bear to let go cos losses too much.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    2,429

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fiat500 View Post
    Not true,they could hv bought it @ sky high prices years ago during the bull run n got stuck with the stocks till now..Can't bear to let go cos losses too much.
    Yes.
    For example Singtel shares.
    It was $4+ at its highest when it first started out in the early 1990s.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,810

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mummy View Post
    Better be careful of property agents talk at this time....got money, want rental income or passive income, buy good blue chip stocks at the right time with good divended....do not be over exposed to property alone as yr investment esp if already old and cannot make up losses...
    Thanks. I have no gut to buy property in Malaysia.

Similar Threads

  1. Advice on investment property?
    By rsrunner123 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 14
    -: 31-01-17, 13:48
  2. Turning to friends for advice turn out to be a bad advice
    By Arcachon in forum Coffeeshop Talk
    Replies: 1
    -: 16-06-14, 20:05
  3. Need Advice: Property Tax.
    By may2012 in forum Finance and Legal
    Replies: 25
    -: 01-03-13, 09:49
  4. need advice for tenure of property
    By deljunks in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 6
    -: 27-05-09, 02:41
  5. D17 Freehold property advice
    By BeeFGee in forum East
    Replies: 13
    -: 09-04-09, 12:26

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •