Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Property cooling steps not going away yet: Report

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    10,829

    Default Property cooling steps not going away yet: Report

    http://www.straitstimes.com/business...way-yet-report

    Property cooling steps not going away yet: Report

    Published Jul 5, 2016

    Marissa Lee


    The pressures on the economy from slower growth and high home prices may prevent the Government from unwinding its property cooling measures, according to Maybank Kim Eng.

    It noted that the slowing economy could prompt the Government to steer funds away from real estate speculation into more productive investments, a move that could also control wage inflation.

    "We are increasingly convinced that property cooling measures may not be lifted, in order to steer investments to more economically-productive uses in the long run," said the brokerage's Singapore research team in a report.

    "Singaporeans have been trained too well by their own Government to see property as the only safe source of long-term value creation," it added, noting that many people are either saving up to afford their first home or waiting for the right time to invest in another.

    Households are sitting on a cash pile of $374 billion, or 93 per cent of national output (GDP), and have $840 billion of capital or 209 per cent of GDP tied up in residential property, according to the Department of Statistics.

    The result is a "poor allocation of capital" when households with lower disposable income spend less and channel less into entrepreneurship, research and development, the report said. And the waste has grown with the rising number of vacant homes.

    As anti-globalisation sentiment spreads across the world, dollar per capita consumption in Singapore - which is lower than in Australia, Hong Kong and Japan - could do with a boost, noted the report, which was released last week.

    Over-investment in property hurts Singapore's cost competitiveness and is partly to blame as wage inflation outstrips productivity growth, said analyst Derrick Heng.

    While home prices tend to track income growth over time as the population can afford to pay more for their homes, Mr Heng noted that high home prices have also lifted wage expectations and contributed to higher labour costs when expatriates negotiate housing packages, for example.

    Notably, labour costs now make up 43 per cent of GDP, a level that preceded the 1985, 1998 and 2001 recessions. Meanwhile, gross operating surplus - a measure of firms' profitability - has fallen to 49 per cent of GDP, the low end of its historical range, said Mr Heng.

    "If wages climb some more, the Government may be forced to provide cost relief for businesses," the report said, noting that Central Provident Fund contribution rates were cut in 1986, 1999 and 2003, about one to two years after labour's share of GDP breached current levels.

    The analysts also warned that "unless property prices plunge suddenly and dramatically", property cooling measures may not be lifted.

    "Banking system robustness suggests softer property prices could be tolerated without inducing systemic risks," the report said. Still, such a scenario would put residential developers and banks on the losing end, as loan demand falls.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    307

    Default

    Unbiased post. Nothing but the truth.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Southbank
    Posts
    9,575

    Default

    Households are sitting on a cash pile of $374 billion, or 93 per cent of national output (GDP), and have $840 billion of capital or 209 per cent of GDP tied up in residential property, according to the Department of Statistics.

    Don't understand, where got "$840 billion of capital or 209 per cent of GDP tied up in residential property,"

    Jun 2006 SGD 535,000 Jun 2010 1,550,000.

    Do this mean SGD 1,550,000 of capital tied up in residential property.

    If yes, I only use SGD 108,000 deposit.

    Statistic don't lie, only the people who use it do.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,035

    Default

    I think it means the wealth if all sold based on current value.

    Potential capital in property is 209% of GDP.

    The GDP "includes" income people who are earning a lot, including business owners and others who have completed servicing their mortgages. Plus people who rent but do not own property. Plus those who have gained 100% on their property previously sold.

    What I am curious is how the cash pile should be deployed in this current environment. 93% of GDP is quite a lot if leveraging is allowed!




    Quote Originally Posted by Arcachon View Post
    Households are sitting on a cash pile of $374 billion, or 93 per cent of national output (GDP), and have $840 billion of capital or 209 per cent of GDP tied up in residential property, according to the Department of Statistics.

    Don't understand, where got "$840 billion of capital or 209 per cent of GDP tied up in residential property,"

    Jun 2006 SGD 535,000 Jun 2010 1,550,000.

    Do this mean SGD 1,550,000 of capital tied up in residential property.

    If yes, I only use SGD 108,000 deposit.

    Statistic don't lie, only the people who use it do.
    The three laws of Kelonguni:

    Where there is kelong, there is guni.
    No kelong no guni.
    More kelong = more guni.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    273

    Default

    One of the main contributor for property high cost (residential and commercial) is the biggest player. And If we really think for a while we will know the biggest player is.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    307

    Default

    If not because of that biggest player, it won't be 90% ownership. Talk is cheap. It really a thankless job. Sighs!!!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    273

    Default

    Yes talk is cheap. Judging people is cheap also

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    273

    Default

    Economics is not rocket science. The cost that needed to make a product will influence the price of final product.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,035

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sandiwara View Post
    One of the main contributor for property high cost (residential and commercial) is the biggest player. And If we really think for a while we will know the biggest player is.
    The ones ending up to be the biggest winners will be the ones aligning their directions and expectations with the strategies of the biggest players.
    The three laws of Kelonguni:

    Where there is kelong, there is guni.
    No kelong no guni.
    More kelong = more guni.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    273

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kelonguni View Post
    The ones ending up to be the biggest winners will be the ones aligning their directions and expectations with the strategies of the biggest players.
    Agree.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    307

    Default

    No doubt no rocket science, sometimes face a few astronauts and ministers is much easier than face a big group of population.
    When prices too low some ingrate ( own multiple properties ) will blame them for not doing well, on the other hand when prices too high another group of ingrate ( no property ) will blame them for doing too well and push the price too high. A loser will blame everyone except himself. Blame it to the ancestor even though there is no devil for the failure. Sighs

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    273

    Default

    Should I say that the main contributor is a baby just born so that I will not touch somebody Ego

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    307

    Default

    自欺欺人, it is not about the matter of ego . One have to be truthful and don't mislead other.

Similar Threads

  1. Time to review cooling steps, say property players
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 19-08-14, 15:53
  2. Property cooling steps net $500m for taxman
    By reporter2 in forum Finance and Legal
    Replies: 2
    -: 24-09-12, 21:38
  3. 'More property cooling steps unlikely'
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 24-06-12, 01:28
  4. Property cooling steps working: Mah
    By hyenergix in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 27
    -: 07-04-11, 23:27
  5. Property cooling steps working: Mah
    By mr funny in forum HDB, EC, commercial and industrial property discussion
    Replies: 0
    -: 04-04-11, 19:14

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •