Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 138

Thread: Some measures for shoeboxes announced

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,857

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eng81157
    really?! Look at ECo and Watertown going at 1200psf and beyond.

    http://www.ura.gov.sg/realEstateWeb/...ubmitSearch.do

    Nathan residences - FH, D9 going for est. 1600psf

    This only shows one thing - stupidity (and carrotcake-ness) knows no bounds
    i think it's the quantum - CCR properties tend to be larger (around 1300 sq ft for a 3BR) while OCR apartments are smaller (1000 sq ft for 3 BR) hence more affordable
    I am rich in debts...

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    70

    Default

    ok some info about watertown:
    from http://my-punggolwaterway.com/?page_id=88
    it says Permissible GFA: Residential: 75,598.24 sqm
    from http://www.e-singaporeproperty.com/w...ndominium.html,
    it says that there are 992 residential units in watertown
    so
    average size of each units is about 76sqm

    So we have seen that even similar development like WaterTown will not be affected by this new measure in the future. This, imo, is just another lame attempt to curb the market. But KBW should put more effort into solving HDB housing instead.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,243

    Default

    Would this result in super big balcony? Eg using standard GFA on top of bonus GFA to build more balcony space and thus lowering the psf since it is cheaper to build balconies. This will minimize quantum increase while creating more floor space per unit. Or the return of bay windows....

  4. #34
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mantrix
    i think it's the quantum - CCR properties tend to be larger (around 1300 sq ft for a 3BR) while OCR apartments are smaller (1000 sq ft for 3 BR) hence more affordable
    Project NameStreet NameTypeNo. of UnitsPrice
    ($)Area (Sqft)1
    Type of Area2
    Unit Price ($psf)3
    Date of Option Exercised / Sales Agreement SignedNATHAN RESIDENCES NATHAN ROADApartment1980,000592Strata1,655Jun-12NATHAN RESIDENCES NATHAN ROADApartment1948,000592Strata1,601Apr-12NATHAN RESIDENCES NATHAN ROADApartment11,240,000786Strata1,578Apr-12NATHAN RESIDENCES NATHAN ROADApartment1885,000592Strata1,495Mar-12NATHAN RESIDENCES NATHAN ROADApartment1920,000592Strata1,554Mar-12Project NameStreet NameTypeNo. of UnitsPrice
    ($)Area (Sqft)1
    Type of Area2
    Unit Price ($psf)3
    Date of Option Exercised / Sales Agreement SignedNATHAN RESIDENCES NATHAN ROADApartment1980,000592Strata1,655Jun-12NATHAN RESIDENCES NATHAN ROADApartment1948,000592Strata1,601Apr-12NATHAN RESIDENCES NATHAN ROADApartment11,240,000786Strata1,578Apr-12NATHAN RESIDENCES NATHAN ROADApartment1885,000592Strata1,495Mar-12NATHAN RESIDENCES NATHAN ROADApartment1920,000592Strata1,554Mar-12

    Not entirely true.....

    NATHAN RESIDENCES NATHAN ROADApartment1980,000592Strata1,655Jun-12
    Nathan residences
    592sqft, 1655psf in Jun 2012
    592sqft, 1601psf in Apr 2012

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    5,675

    Default

    Most probably we will see apartments with a/c ledge that surrounds the whole of the unit's parameter.


  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    70

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kanarazu
    Would this result in super big balcony? Eg using standard GFA on top of bonus GFA to build more balcony space and thus lowering the psf since it is cheaper to build balconies. This will minimize quantum increase while creating more floor space per unit. Or the return of bay windows....
    Bonus GFA has to be used for balcony space anyway, with or without the new measure. That is the old rule.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,990

    Default

    Govt wanna reduce number of units in each development.

    Developers wanna protect profit margins.

    Buyers want small quantum for affordability.

    Solution?
    Build 507sf 2bedders. Sell at least 700k each for OCR. If super near mrt or mall can sell 800k up. 700-800k is perceived market price for two bedders. Developers get same or even better profit margin plus save on building materials. Everyone happy.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,014

    Default

    This is simply the authority saying... No more small quantum (in terms of $$$ with high $/psf) units.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    8,926

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by azeoprop
    Most probably we will see apartments with a/c ledge that surrounds the whole of the unit's parameter.

    something like this, replace planter with AC ledge??

    Ride at your own risk !!!

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,243

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kanarazu
    Would this result in super big balcony? Eg using standard GFA on top of bonus GFA to build more balcony space and thus lowering the psf since it is cheaper to build balconies. This will minimize quantum increase while creating more floor space per unit. Or the return of bay windows....
    Or build more carpark lots per unit which counts towards GFA.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    8,926

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by carbuncle
    Govt wanna reduce number of units in each development.

    Developers wanna protect profit margins.

    Buyers want small quantum for affordability.

    Solution?
    Build 507sf 2bedders. Sell at least 700k each for OCR. If super near mrt or mall can sell 800k up. 700-800k is perceived market price for two bedders. Developers get same or even better profit margin plus save on building materials. Everyone happy.
    So it will be:

    186 X 45sqm 2br
    186 X 70sqm 3br
    186 X 95sqm 4br

    Ride at your own risk !!!

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,739

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by carbuncle
    I was dozing off when the circular was published lol. In summary, the Telok Kurau computation over 100sqm will be applied to Kovan and Joo Chiat the other two hotspots. For all others outside Central area, computation will be based off 70sqm.

    Existing MMs in those named areas - HUAT AH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No more competition liao yahoo!!! Next time all will need to rent 3.2k above for the 'at least 70sqm' units.
    20 years down the road, those MM projects difficult to enbloc.
    since the trend is for large units before enbloc to become smaller unit after, and not small units to become larger.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hopeful
    20 years down the road, those MM projects difficult to enbloc.
    since the trend is for large units before enbloc to become smaller unit after, and not small units to become larger.
    thats very true.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,990

    Default

    bro hopeful, seriously, with the roti prata style of our policy makers, do you think you can speak for the next ten years? I don't even dare to guess for next two years.

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,990

    Default

    Judicious Market Intervention

    As regulators, we try not to interfere in the normal functioning of the market, or to second-guess it. But occasionally, some judicious intervention for public interest is necessary when the market outcome is less than satisfactory.

    For example in recent years many residential projects in Telok Kurau area have led to a rampant development of tiny shoebox units in that area, resulting in disamenities such as severe traffic congestion, shortage of car parks and double-parking. Residents in that area appealed for development guidelines to restrict the over-development of such tiny housing units.

    After consulting with the stakeholders, URA decided to move in, but in a judicious way, without over-regulating or stifling the creativity of developers.

    Hence, instead of specifying a minimum floor area for an apartment, URA chose to limit the maximum number of apartments that developers can propose in a particular development. This way, developers are still free to build small apartments if there is demand, but there must be a good mixture of large and small units, in order to meet the URA guidelines.

    The planning guidelines were implemented in Nov 2011. It was very well received, by architects, developers and the local residents.

    Meanwhile, elsewhere, outside of the Central Area, some new developments have included a large proportion of shoebox units. I voiced concern about this trend in a couple of blog posts. Many Singaporeans voiced similar concerns too. Unlike the Central Area, the suburbs are largely for families. While there is a need for smaller units, like studio apartments, 2-rm flats and shoebox units for the singles, retirees and small families, too many in the same locality cannot be optimal.

    Many developers have frowned on this trend too. To be sure, this is not a general industry practice, but largely confined to a few developments.

    After watching this development for a while, URA decided that it should intervene as it had done before. This afternoon, it announced the new planning guidelines to address the issue of developments which consist predominantly of shoebox units outside the Central Area.

    The new URA planning guidelines are measured and moderate. There will still be shoebox units to meet the need of a segment of the population, but there will also be many more larger units, to meet the demand of the other population segments.

    I am confident this judicious market intervention will again be welcomed by the stakeholders, developers and residents.

    Please visit the MND Facebook to leave a comment.

  16. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    131

    Default

    I see this as good news for existing OCR studio owners like myself.

    Less supply in future will lead to higher prices???

  17. #47
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,660

    Default

    Central Area: It comprises the following 11 Planning Areas :Outram, Museum, Newton,River Valley, Singapore River, Marina South,Marina East, Straits View, Rochor, Orchard and Downtown Core

    BBBasically it is just limited mostly to CCR that does not have this restriction since the shoebox units are not very prevalent: http://www.ura.gov.sg/circulars/text/dc12-13app1.pdf

    There are 3 pricing bands for this comparison 500k-750k, 350k-<500k, >750k-<1mil

    Did a runthrough on the stats and it is indeed scary to the max where the high risk group is based on the same price price band with comparison to the planing area


    [Central Area]
    Property Type : Non-Landed - All (exclude EC)
    Planning Area : Downtown Core, Marina East, Marina South, Museum, Newton, Outram, Orchard, Straits View, Rochor, River Valley, Singapore River
    Floor/Land Area (sqm) : 0 - 46.5
    Total Price ($) : 500000 - 750000
    Contract Date : JAN 2011 - AUG 2012
    Units: 41
    Note: Most transacted prices starts from 650k onwards

    Property Type : Non-Landed - All (exclude EC)
    Planning Area : Downtown Core, Marina East, Marina South, Museum, Newton, Outram, Orchard, Straits View, Rochor, River Valley, Singapore River
    Floor/Land Area (sqm) : 0 - 46.5
    Total Price ($) : 750001 - 999999
    Contract Date : JAN 2011 - AUG 2012
    Units: 132

    [Non-Central Area]
    Property Type : Non-Landed - All (exclude EC)
    Planning Area : Ang Mo Kio, Bedok, Bukit Batok, Boon Lay, Bukit Merah, Bishan, Bukit Timah, Changi Bay, Central Water Catchment, Changi , Choa Chu Kang, Clementi, Geylang, Hougang, Jurong East, Jurong West, Kallang, Lim Chu Kang, Mandai, Marine Parade, North-Eastern Islands, Novena, Punggol, Paya Lebar, Pioneer, Pasir Ris, Queenstown, Sembawang, Sengkang, Serangoon, Southern Islands, Sungei Kadut, Seletar, Simpang, Tengah, Tampines, Tanglin, Toa Payoh, Tuas, Western Water Catchment, Woodlands, Western Islands, Yishun
    Floor/Land Area (sqm) : 0 - 46.5
    Total Price ($) : 500000 - 750000
    Contract Date : JAN 2011 - AUG 2012

    Units: 2926
    Note: 25 percentile: 500k-550k, 50 percentile: >550-<600k, 75 percentile: >600k-<650k

    Property Type : Non-Landed - All (exclude EC)
    Planning Area : Ang Mo Kio, Bedok, Bukit Batok, Boon Lay, Bukit Merah, Bishan, Bukit Timah, Changi Bay, Central Water Catchment, Changi , Choa Chu Kang, Clementi, Geylang, Hougang, Jurong East, Jurong West, Kallang, Lim Chu Kang, Mandai, Marine Parade, North-Eastern Islands, Novena, Punggol, Paya Lebar, Pioneer, Pasir Ris, Queenstown, Sembawang, Sengkang, Serangoon, Southern Islands, Sungei Kadut, Seletar, Simpang, Tengah, Tampines, Tanglin, Toa Payoh, Tuas, Western Water Catchment, Woodlands, Western Islands, Yishun
    Floor/Land Area (sqm) : 0 - 46.5
    Total Price ($) : 350000 - 499999
    Contract Date : JAN 2011 - AUG 2012

    Units: 649
    Note: Most transacted prices starts from 400k onwards

  18. #48
    ikan bilis's Avatar
    ikan bilis is offline i'm Buaya ! Girls BEWARE !!...
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,385

    Default

    heya...

    now the MMs are around 35sqm...
    if kenobi wan die die want average 70sqm condo hor, then developers can go build 70sqm dual-key mm mah... each side in the dual-key is a 35sqm studio/1-bdr...
    that will make developers happy, buyers happy, kenobi wan happy, tenants happy... so everybody happy and shiok !!..


  19. #49
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ikan bilis
    heya...

    now the MMs are around 35sqm...
    if kenobi wan die die want average 70sqm condo hor, then developers can go build 70sqm dual-key mm mah... each side in the dual-key is a 35sqm studio/1-bdr...
    that will make developers happy, buyers happy, kenobi wan happy, tenants happy... so everybody happy and shiok !!..

    better not play with fire lah. if not sure kenna more CMs.

  20. #50
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    Does it mean that developers with existing land bank will have to submit their plans to URA before 4th Nov in order not to be penalized by the new regulation?

  21. #51
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    2,368

    Default

    I think its about time URA redefine central area. D9,10,11 is outdated - and some parts of D10 and D11 is so far from town.

    Anyway, I guess the impact is negative on non-central areas since developers cannot build exclusively MM anymore. But since most developers do NOT build exclusively MM in suburbs, I suspect few areas are adversely affected, other than the MM paradise in D14 and D15 like Telok Kurau, Joo Chiat and Geylang, and perhaps Stevens area where new launches also all MM. Its good news that now the suburban areas will consist of fairly large units on average - not too cramped and positive for living environment

    So central areas land value probably will increase because there is less restrictions on what developers can and cannot do. Developers who exclusively build MMs most likely will bid for land in the central areas. Let all the MMs congregate there - doesn't matter to me if the place becomes congested and unlivable....

    Quote Originally Posted by windcar
    In fact MOST parts of Bukit Timah is not considered central. Even Robin Road and part of Steven road are not considered central. But some parts of East coast Park way is considered central. Crazy.

  22. #52
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wild Falcon
    I think its about time URA redefine central area. D9,10,11 is outdated - and some parts of D10 and D11 is so far from town.

    Anyway, I guess the impact is negative on non-central areas since developers cannot build exclusively MM anymore. But since most developers do NOT build exclusively MM in suburbs, I suspect few areas are adversely affected, other than the MM paradise in D14 and D15 like Telok Kurau, Joo Chiat and Geylang, and perhaps Stevens area where new launches also all MM. Its good news that now the suburban areas will consist of fairly large units on average - not too cramped and positive for living environment

    So central areas land value probably will increase because there is less restrictions on what developers can and cannot do. Developers who exclusively build MMs most likely will bid for land in the central areas. Let all the MMs congregate there - doesn't matter to me if the place becomes congested and unlivable....
    perhaps thats the reason why FEO went in so aggressively on the Farrer Road plot.

  23. #53
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silver023
    Using demand-supply theory, means OCR MM unit prices will increase?
    Was there real demand in the 1st place? More of a developer playing quantum game.

  24. #54
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    543

    Default

    Developers with difficult to sell OCR, high psf shoebox unit will have to thank KBW. Those with months no buyers will be snapped up soon.

  25. #55
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    2,368

    Default

    Farrer is outside Central Area so the new rule will apply.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo33
    perhaps thats the reason why FEO went in so aggressively on the Farrer Road plot.

  26. #56
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    the most badly hit will be those small boutique developers who bought super small land sized plot. how are they going to strike a balance between the big and small units when they originally planned for just 1 and 2 bedders?!

  27. #57
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,141

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter
    the most badly hit will be those small boutique developers who bought super small land sized plot. how are they going to strike a balance between the big and small units when they originally planned for just 1 and 2 bedders?!
    Who cares? Let them go kaboom loh

  28. #58
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,243

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter
    the most badly hit will be those small boutique developers who bought super small land sized plot. how are they going to strike a balance between the big and small units when they originally planned for just 1 and 2 bedders?!
    Kovan Lodge enbloc will be the interesting one to watch.

  29. #59
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,420

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter
    the most badly hit will be those small boutique developers who bought super small land sized plot. how are they going to strike a balance between the big and small units when they originally planned for just 1 and 2 bedders?!
    They will quick quick submit before the ruling kicks in... The last of the suburban MMs

  30. #60
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,035

    Default

    Its one Govt strategy to ensure sustainability of the property price actually.

    Prevent the quantum from going down (higher sf even if psf drops), as well as work on the mean size of private apartment.

    These are important stats to report. So rest assured, not much changes to the big game plan. Mean 70sqm has more than enough grounds to play with. Mean 100sqm is more tricky though.

Similar Threads

  1. Raising ABSD for second homes among new property-cooling measures announced
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 134
    -: 27-07-18, 08:35
  2. Shoeboxes Two Years On
    By mcmlxxvi in forum Coffeeshop Talk
    Replies: 1
    -: 05-07-15, 16:50
  3. More property cooling measures announced
    By Ringo33 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 471
    -: 15-01-13, 04:31
  4. Perfect for Shoeboxes
    By carbuncle in forum Coffeeshop Talk
    Replies: 10
    -: 11-09-12, 23:25
  5. Conrad Raj: Shoeboxes not too small for comfort
    By TheOnlyGayInTheVillage in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 13
    -: 09-06-12, 15:34

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •